User:Ltbdl/sandbox
Ding! Thanks for playing Wikipedia. Unfortunately, you just got pwned because you're a boneheaded moron. See Wikipedia:Complete bollocks. GAME OVER. Sorry, you lose, homeboy. Better luck next time You probably aren't reading this part, so it really doesn't matter what we say here. More to the point, if you haven't bothered to read every single policy and essay on Wikipedia, including the ones that contradict each other, then it is really your own fault and you should be ashamed of yourself. We don't have time to explain; it is up to you to find and read them all. And if you ever create the article again, then we will smack you with our banhammer and make you put big orange boxes all over your user page while you beg for your "edit this page" button to start working again. Face it, everyone will know you were caught and are a loser. Don't even think about it.
If you've had this nice red box slap you in the face, feel free to go and tell all your friends that Wikipedia is full of killjoy nazis. Hey, why not set up an attack page or two, while you're at it? |
– from User:L293D/db-g0
This user has been called a homophobic slur by an IP or sockpuppet 5 times. Would you like to be called a homophobic slur by an IP or sockpuppet? |
I in the American flag and the republic which means loyalty, one nation pledge under freedom and justice and divided impossible God because of everything.
a gallery of spectacles
edit– from File:All I Want For Christmas Is for this RFC to be over.jpg
use without caution
edituseful redirects to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
edit- Wikipedia:Wretched hive of scum and villainy
- Wikipedia:Great Dismal Swamp
- Wikipedia:Complaints about other contributors
- WP:LITTLEORPHAN
- User:Zppix/enwikihell
- Wikipedia:Room101
- Wikipedia:Users for deletion
- Wikipedia:Complaints Department
- WP:AIRINGOFGRIEVANCES
- Wikipedia:Slough of Despond
- WP:HAPPYPLACE
Results 1 – 33 of 33
- User:Spe88/GoTo.Main Page → Main Page (links to redirect • history • Template:Stats.grok.se) [ Closure: keep/delete ]
No incoming links; user hasnt contributed for 6 years. John Vandenberg (chat) 09:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- keep. Exactly what benefit do you see will be accrued from deletion here? Thryduulf (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Meaningless, useless, worthless. In a word, junk. Don't encourage junk. — Scott • talk 12:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Calling a redirect names is inadequate rationale for deletion. This is not a "really harmful" redirect. There is nothing here that supports deletion. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 21:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - even if they haven't been a while, productive users should be given a lot of freedom to play around with their userspace as long as it isn't harmful. Harshly treating encyclopaedia-building users for no gain will discourage participation and make the atmoshpere here more hostile, a huge detriment to the project. WilyD 09:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nice red herring, but nobody is proposing treating encyclopedia-building users harshly. Spe88 gave up on this project in April 2007 and thus is not an encyclopedia-building user by definition. We are not obliged to maintain every shred of abandoned meaningless clutter (no incoming links, exactly zero prospect of ever getting any) created by long-gone users experimenting. — Scott • talk 14:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Neither you nor I know when or if they'll return to the project. That they may not return is not a good reason for us to be dicks to them when it is of zero benefit to the encyclopaedic building project. That you feel the need to other them to justify gross mistreatment of them is telling. WilyD 15:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- LOL. That is all. — Scott • talk 17:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Scott, please treat other contributors with respect even if you disagree with them. WilyD is entirely correct that we don't know whether a user is coming back or not, and that it is an entirely inappropriate to treat them as somehow inferior because of that. The user was apparently in good standing when they left and so remains in good standing unless and until they return and actively engage in behaviour that changes that status. Thryduulf (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- WilyD's comment is quite possibly the most laughable thing I've ever read in a Wikipedia discussion, and I've been here a long time. It's not right; it's not even wrong. This business about "inferiority" and "standing" is entirely in your own mind, by the way, and is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand. Which, as it appears to be necessary to return to the point, is the point of maintaining useless junk in our database for the benefit of an imaginary person - Spe88's ghost. Not Spe88; Spe88 is gone, gone, gone. Anyone with the slightest shred of common sense is able to see that, but WilyD apparently swapped his for a tendency to engage in histrionic rhetoric. — Scott • talk 21:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- What part of "treat other users with respect" and "assume good faith" do you not understand? Additionally, please show evidence of the harm caused by this redirect, evidence for your assertion that Spe88 is imaginary, and evidence for your assertions that WilyD has no common sense and is engaging in histrionic rhetoric. You should not need to be reminded that WP:No personal attacks is a policy that applies to everybody. Thryduulf (talk) 00:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- WilyD's comment is quite possibly the most laughable thing I've ever read in a Wikipedia discussion, and I've been here a long time. It's not right; it's not even wrong. This business about "inferiority" and "standing" is entirely in your own mind, by the way, and is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand. Which, as it appears to be necessary to return to the point, is the point of maintaining useless junk in our database for the benefit of an imaginary person - Spe88's ghost. Not Spe88; Spe88 is gone, gone, gone. Anyone with the slightest shred of common sense is able to see that, but WilyD apparently swapped his for a tendency to engage in histrionic rhetoric. — Scott • talk 21:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Scott, please treat other contributors with respect even if you disagree with them. WilyD is entirely correct that we don't know whether a user is coming back or not, and that it is an entirely inappropriate to treat them as somehow inferior because of that. The user was apparently in good standing when they left and so remains in good standing unless and until they return and actively engage in behaviour that changes that status. Thryduulf (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- LOL. That is all. — Scott • talk 17:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Neither you nor I know when or if they'll return to the project. That they may not return is not a good reason for us to be dicks to them when it is of zero benefit to the encyclopaedic building project. That you feel the need to other them to justify gross mistreatment of them is telling. WilyD 15:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nice red herring, but nobody is proposing treating encyclopedia-building users harshly. Spe88 gave up on this project in April 2007 and thus is not an encyclopedia-building user by definition. We are not obliged to maintain every shred of abandoned meaningless clutter (no incoming links, exactly zero prospect of ever getting any) created by long-gone users experimenting. — Scott • talk 14:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. (Disclosure: I saw this discussion mentioned off-site.) I can't see how this redirect is useful to anyone. If by any chance the user should return, it is a matter of 2 minutes for them to recreate it. We shouldn't keep lots of redirects lying around that are of no use to anyone. It's just good housekeeping. Andreas JN466 23:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Good housekeeping implies there is benefit from the activity. Please can you explain what the benefit actually is as nobody above has yet done so. Thryduulf (talk) 08:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Let's note first of all that the "activity" requires an infinitesimal amount of work, and that deletion has no discernible downside whatsoever. Thus even a small benefit results in a positive cost/benefit ratio. So here are some of the potential benefits of deletion: (1) The "What links here" page for the main page will be less cluttered, ensuring that the pages shown there might actually be of interest to an editor checking the "What links here", and that such an editor will not have to sift through detritus to find what is of interest. (2) The redirect is clearly not watched. It could at any time be used to redirect to anything whatsoever. As such it could be used for various types of vandalism and mischief. (3) Unused user space redirects like this one inflate project stats, adding noise to project data. (4) Imagine a user created several thousand useless redirects like this. It would impose additional overhead on the servers. Creating the impression that any useless page in user space is a legitimate use of Foundation resources is likely to encourage undesirable behaviour. (5) If an editor bothered to nominate the thing in good faith, to oppose deletion for no project benefit whatsoever seems pointy, and unlikely to increase enthusiasm for participation. I could understand if there was something worth fighting for here, but there is literally nothing. Andreas JN466 00:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- The "nothing" worth "fighting for" should never be about a contest, but about the consensus found in the policies and guidelines. The appropriate guideline for this type of redirect (beyond what we read at the top of the main RFD page) is found at WP:USERSPACE, which guides us that Template:Maroon There is no reason to go to the trouble it would take to delete this perfectly harmless redirect. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 16:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Let's note first of all that the "activity" requires an infinitesimal amount of work, and that deletion has no discernible downside whatsoever. Thus even a small benefit results in a positive cost/benefit ratio. So here are some of the potential benefits of deletion: (1) The "What links here" page for the main page will be less cluttered, ensuring that the pages shown there might actually be of interest to an editor checking the "What links here", and that such an editor will not have to sift through detritus to find what is of interest. (2) The redirect is clearly not watched. It could at any time be used to redirect to anything whatsoever. As such it could be used for various types of vandalism and mischief. (3) Unused user space redirects like this one inflate project stats, adding noise to project data. (4) Imagine a user created several thousand useless redirects like this. It would impose additional overhead on the servers. Creating the impression that any useless page in user space is a legitimate use of Foundation resources is likely to encourage undesirable behaviour. (5) If an editor bothered to nominate the thing in good faith, to oppose deletion for no project benefit whatsoever seems pointy, and unlikely to increase enthusiasm for participation. I could understand if there was something worth fighting for here, but there is literally nothing. Andreas JN466 00:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Good housekeeping implies there is benefit from the activity. Please can you explain what the benefit actually is as nobody above has yet done so. Thryduulf (talk) 08:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Its a worthless CNR. Like Jayen466 said, there is literaly no reason to keep all these useless redirects that people dont use. Beerest 2 talk 19:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Delete per Andreas, but without prejudice against Spe88 recreating it. Please leave a note to Spe88 in and closing statement and/or deletion summery that he's free to recreate this. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 04:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete, basically verbatim per EHC. --BDD (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The redirect doesn't meet any of the criteria at WP:RFD#DELETE, and it may be useful to the user (even if they haven't edited, we don't have a policy of clearing out a retired user's userspace) and the user pages guideline says it's "acceptable". Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The closest I can see regarding sports almanac specifically in WP:NOT is in WP:NOTNEWS #2 (and maybe possibly #4), and Template:Highlight Template:Highlight at us in the spirit,
Make an edit in each of the 168 hours of the week (in UTC), as measured by your XTools timecard.
- Winners: Aoidh, Anon423, Bilorv, ComplexRational, Elli, JPxG, Kusma, MaranoFan, Premeditated Chaos, Tamzin, theleekycauldron, Vaticidalprophet, SounderBruce MeegsC, Kingsif, Gog the Mild, Vami_IV, Your Power
Wikipedia:We already have enough of those, thank you very much
IOS 14
edit
no header! Don’t TOUCH!
Sandbox
editrules
edit1. welcome to Sandbox.
2.No bots
AKBAR
editABC
edit
In order:
ABC 1962 logo
ABC 2021 logo
SBT logo
SBT 2014 logo
TTYL
New test text
New test text
New test text1
Tabued
editTabued is 3 towns. As 1 January, 2
Towns | Population |
---|---|
Tenpue | 514 |
Nataceg | 20 |
Abmiga | 10 |
Tenpue
editBus
editTemplate:Routemap add please
Nataceg
editAbmiga
editAddis Abada
editToday's featured picture
Goats are very cute.
thanks a lot, theresnotime
edit- Today's featured picture
Goats are very cute, but foxes are cuter.
Template:Archive top My Dearest Brunhilde,
I write to you now that I am finally settled in the mines of the New Pages Feed. My accommodations are humble, but sufficient here at the reviewer's village. The work is long, but we have been making good progress ever since we got through the cluster of lists about events that occurred to various branches of the Armed Forces of the United States of Central America (1821). The pay is abysmal and not worth mentioning. I miss you with all my heart, and cannot wait for the day that we are reunited.
Sincerely,
Arthur37 (talk) 23:17, 7 February 1876 (UTC)
Template:Archive bottom
Template:Archive top
My Dearest Brunhilde,
Things have become more difficult since I wrote you last. We were drilling deep into the bedrock of the Feed when suddenly a series of articles about individual startups in Serbia collapsed onto us. They each had exactly one source each that wasn't blatantly promotional, and we had to search in both Cyrillic and Latin. Three reviewers haven't been seen since, and the feed has grown a thousand pages in the meantime. We have been forced into double shifts to compensate. Despite all of these hardships, my love for you endures.
Sincerely,
Arthur37 (talk) 21:09, 10 March 1876 (UTC)
Template:Archive bottom
Template:Archive top
My Dearest Brunhilde,
I am afraid that this has been a difficult two months. Two reviewers got in a fight about something inconsequential at the village and ended up both getting slapped with temporary blocks. The work has piled on so high that it now takes me at least forty minutes just to clear my watchlist at the beginning of each day. Still, we approved a wonderful group of well-written articles about women who fought against slavery in the 1850s. It is bright moments like this that bring a shine to the otherwise dull life that I have had to lead since your father banished me to this place.
Sincerely,
Arthur37 (talk) 6:44, 11 May 1876 (UTC)
Template:Archive bottom
Template:Archive top
My Dearest Brunhilde,
Forgive me for being so long since your last missive, I assure that I have read and treasure every one of them. These months have been terrible. Some idiot kept swapping the content of articles about North Africa with nostalgic articles about the Roman Empire and the Mussolini era before accusing everyone of being Italianophobic and Maltese on the talk page. Then I had to spend weeks cleaning up in the AfD because an editor kept sending sockpuppets to delete discussion pages for articles they started. Rations have been cut and several reviewers appear to have caught scurvy. The backlog is piling up so high that some of the editors have confessed that they haven't always searched for coverage in languages other than English before applying PROD. Your love is my only light in these darkest caverns.
Sincerely,
Arthur37 (talk) 11:23, September 1876 (UTC) Template:Archive bottom
Template:Archive top
My Dearest Brunhilde,
Earwig's Copyvio Detector has gone down. May God have mercy on our souls.
Sincerely,
Arthur37 (talk) 22:40, November 1876 (UTC) Template:Archive bottom
has anybody here heard of Battle For Circle? Somecoolguy12345 (talk) 02:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Somecoolguy12345: Welcome to the Teahouse! I had not heard of this, but found some information with a quick Google search. I do not see any mention of it in the English Wikipedia. Do you have a question about Wikipedia? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Battle For Circle is one of my favorite object shows
- it has 20 circles and 14 episodes all named circle (BFDI has 63 episodes so far for comparison) Somecoolguy12345 (talk) 15:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Somecoolguy12345, do you have a question about editing Wikipedia? This is a place for folks to ask questions about editing. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- no not really Somecoolguy12345 (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Somecoolguy12345, do you have a question about editing Wikipedia? This is a place for folks to ask questions about editing. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
UR MOM'S A RANDOM SANDBOX CRAP nuhuh NO U LOL GAYS.
LOL SANDBOX ON WHEELS
HAAGGGEERRRR!!! Sandbox!
Ryan ON WHEELS!!!!!
According to [1] this is the 1,000,000th edit to ANI!!! You may all bow down to me. (And yes, I padded in a few edits to get thereTemplate:SndI have to go to bed.) EEng 08:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- I just went one better. Neil S. Walker (talk) 08:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say he "paddied in a few edits to get there" - rather that he EEngineered it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 10:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete AN/I barely edited, viewed, or watched page. Clearly no need for it. :) ansh666 09:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete AN/I and Permaban EEng. It was fun while it lasted. --Tarage (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Indef EEng per WP:TE/WP:POINT. DMacks (talk) 09:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- I cant believe he wasted it on this post tbh. Should have posted something that required rev-deletion. Only in death does duty end (talk) 09:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- You could say that this does warrant revdel... Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete AN/I Fails WP:GNG and WP:MILL, page is in all likelihood just another place to air grievances. SamHolt6 (talk) 09:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Giant Boomerang - This is just another timesink thread started by EEng. At this point it's clear that EEng is not here to contribute to the overall improvement of the encyclopaedia. Support CBAN without SO. (jk... but only slightly) I'm leaning weak support on the delete AN/I too. Mr rnddude (talk) 09:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- WP:DENY. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 09:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Siteban EEng, while we're at it revoke TPA, range block everything EEng could possibly use, I want to see every CheckUser on point to stop him coming back. This gaming Wikipedia. Also, delete ANI as it is clearly the largest soap box in the factory. Blackmane (talk) 09:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, Yes it has its faults and I see the delete !vote points, but what page doesn't? Its much better to have a centralised discussion here rather than spread out across the project. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Look ArbCom don't have many cases nowadays so they should just handle everything My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 10:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Indef Topic Ban EEng from all other pages than AN/I. He deserves it. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete WP:Great Dismal Swamp, as not based on WP:AGF. A million + 19 edits that could have gone to articles ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- +20 edits. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:56, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Why are y'all loitering around here for? Go build the encyclopedia... oh wait. MER-C 13:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Promote - it's about time this article appeared on the main page. While we're at it, let's delete the main page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not going to add anything to this crapfest. And you can't make me. Softlavender (talk) 13:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- SanFranBan at this point this is all we as a community can request. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Can't we also request an ice cream party with a bounce house and pony rides? Or a unicorn that farts rainbows? DMacks (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- That last item would be subject to tax. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Can't we also request an ice cream party with a bounce house and pony rides? Or a unicorn that farts rainbows? DMacks (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pig the pipes or indef Wikipetan We have enough editors. L3X1 (distænt write) 15:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Send EEng to the Phantom Zone DarkKnight2149 15:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - EEng inadvertently created a way for editors to quickly locate active admins. He deserves to be enshrined in the Museum of Alle-wiki-glory. Atsme📞📧 16:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Too true. The only reason this is a "cesspit" is because editors do cesspitty things here. WP:BAREYOURBEHIND is where they need to go :) L3X1 (distænt write) 16:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep EEng here in this cell, now that he's padded it. In fact, according to [2] he's the top contributor here, which would normally be a call to move him to a new facility, but by the same source he's deleted more than he's contributed, so it's all good. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- And most of those deletes were correcting his own edits before acquiring the feature, "Show preview and changes". Atsme📞📧 17:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- That's only analyzing the past 10,000 edits. That's only 2 months worth. Natureium (talk) 20:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Shhh!! A full in-depth analysis of the situation is discouraged around here. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Bent railroad spike instead of boomerang. -Roxy, Zalophus californianus. barcus 17:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Upside-down boomerang instead of bent railroad spike. Κσυπ Cyp 17:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete ANI - now can we get our friendly neighborhood stewaard to act on this obvious consensus? Tazerdadog (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to three ring circus. They're both the same thing, right? Lepricavark (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure. Isn't one generally considered more dangerous than the other? 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but which one? Lepricavark (talk) 18:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- How about a redirect to Great Dismal Swamp maroons instead? Recommended reading! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but which one? Lepricavark (talk) 18:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure. Isn't one generally considered more dangerous than the other? 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect ANI to EEng - He is God now. -- Sock puppet of Darkknight2149
- Close discussion: Wonder what this is all about? Is this even any incident? Is this a joke of a hang-around or something? This does not look much of a legitimate incident discussion. I do understand that ANI has hit a milestone of over a million edits, but suddenly, things should be cut short, so that admins can be focused on the job. Cannot have too much fun here. Slasher405 (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Refer to Friend Computer, as fun is manditorily prohibited. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Demand a recount. It seems much much more..Are you taking into account the 29 foot deep stratum of ancient peanut shells which proves conclusively that this noticeboard has seen continuous human drahma-based habitation for at least 5,000 years?[citation needed]. Irondome (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Uhm, Irondome...you said "stratum of ancient peanut shells" - sounds a bit anatomical. You can't be talking about EEng. Template:FBDB Atsme📞📧 22:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Roll for initiative. EEng is clearly an evil wizard that must be defeated. oknazevad (talk) 20:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect AN/I to the Teahouse, then redirect TH to Articles for creation, then redirect AFC to AN/I, then step back and watch while chaos ensues. –FlyingAce✈hello 20:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Right! Stop that! It's silly. nagualdesign 20:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Permaban Clearly in order here. There is a time for thinking and a time for action and THIS IS NOT A TIME FOR THINKING!!! Buffs (talk) 22:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for all your kind words. You've brought a moment of joy into the life of a lonely and forgotten shut-in.
- Lest anyone get the wrong idea, it's true I'm the top contributor to ANI in the last X months, measured by number of edits. But I rush to point out that fully 40% of my edits are using OneClick to archive old threads. The actual top busybody here is Beyond My Ken. He's got almost as many edits as I do, and 0% of them are OneClick. EEng 02:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's even worse when you look at all my edits to this page overall, including my previous two accounts [3]. Of course, even 8921 edits (this one makes
8922892389248925) is only 4% of my total of 218,686 edits (now281,687281,688281,689281,670) -- almost all of them made by hand, with no automation or semi-automation. Of course, I estimate that I make about 2-3 copyedits to each AN/I comment after I post it, so it's actually something like 1% to 1.4% of my total edits. Looked at in this way, I believe there are many editors whose edits to this page make up a much more sizable portion of their overall edits. Take the editor (naming no names, and not an admin, but a name that would be recognized by old-timers here) whose 2855 edits to AN/I made up 14% of their 24,450 overall edits.Template:ParabrSo... am I a busybody? Yeah, maybe, probably, but I also pull my weight building the encyclopedia, and I figure that gives me the right to stick my nose into whatever things the community is considering. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's a dirty, thankless job, but somebody has got to wave a mop at the bubbling green alien goo. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's even worse when you look at all my edits to this page overall, including my previous two accounts [3]. Of course, even 8921 edits (this one makes
I'm growing increasingly wary of Wikipedia nowadays. What happened to Wikipedia's supposed neutrality? There is a clear leftist bias in this article. There was no "attack" on the Capitol building. It was a protest. This article very clearly tries to skew the reader's opinions against them and tries to make it seem like it was an attempted coup, insurrection, attack, etc. It was not any of those things. Most of the sources are left-leaning. There is an extreme lack of balanced reporting in this article, with DJT's quotes being very obviously cherrypicked. And they have the audacity to lock it in this state over "vandalism"? This article makes many bold claims like how the supposed rioters assaulted police and vandalised buildings or that it was caused by far-right extremism, and that the purpose of the protest was to start a coup d'etat. Citation desperately needed. Meanwhile the BLM articles don't even mention the countless looting, arson, rioting, and murders done in their name. Very disappointing from you guys. 76.98.98.168 (talk) 04:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- There are lots and lots of citations in this article; if you can't be arsed to read them, that's not a problem we can fix. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Tq Have you seen any of the bodycam footage from the officers on the ground? soibangla (talk) 04:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sounds like you're getting your information from Fox News and OAAN. Perhaps your needs would be better situated at Conservapedia. ––FormalDude talk 05:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia, for the most part, reflects mainstream coverage. Mainstream coverage describes it overwhelmingly as an attack, a riot, or words to that effect. --Aquillion (talk) 07:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- We go with what RS say.Slatersteven (talk) 10:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- By left-leaning, I assume you mean pro-business. That describes reliable news sources. Neutrality doesn't mean even-handedness toward different views, but providing the views described in reliable sources using the same weight they do. TFD (talk) 15:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- LOL, okay. Love of Corey (talk) 05:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has been hijacked by evil people on the left. My advice is spread that news to everyone you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielleevandenbosch (talk • contribs) 08:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- For most people in the world, Wikipedia rubber-stamps capitalism, freedom and democracy. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- LOL, okay. Love of Corey (talk) 08:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- See User talk:Danielleevandenbosch#Not here. Since December 2017 only makes partisan edits attacking content, editors, Wikipedia, and it's policies -- Valjean (talk) 18:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Ahem. If a person does not want their bio printed at all, then whatever you do to it, and no matter how you mess with it, you cannot be acting with the highest standards of love and respect for the dignity of others. In that case, these standards ("verifiable" writing, and love) are simply incompatable, even if you wish otherwise. At best, you may simply be an enabler or co-violator, who acts to mitigate the invasion of privacy, by acting to decrease the outrage. But that doesn't count if you give your assent to the whole process. Giving a drink in a torture chamber doesn't make you a saint if you assent to torture chambers. Being kind to a person in prison doesn't count if you assent to the imprisonment of a person who doesn't deserve to be there at all. If you've got two burglars in a house arguing over whether or not to steal just cash, but not an antique ring which might cause the owner some extra anguish, and one burglar starts talking about "standards of love and respect for the dignity of others," then you know somebody is mightily confused. People who care about love and respect for others don't violate their houses AT ALL. Nada. They don't engage in legalistic niceties about what's kosher to steal and what isn't. I hope that's enough metaphors for the day and that the point comes across. SBHarris 20:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think you mean it's more like HITLER - David Gerard 12:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, the point seems to come across -- we should forget about being an encyclopedia, since an encyclopedia is really, really similar to a torture chamber, and repurpose ourselves as a press release service, since "the highest standards of love and respect for the dignity of others" means saying whatever they want us to say (even if what they want us to say is something akin to "each and every one of my alleged victims is a publicity-seeking liar", which does not show much love and respect for said victims who are now being publicly accused of wrongdoing.) -- Antaeus Feldspar 15:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is indeed a fascinating exchange. On one side we see a person with a vision in which human diginity plays an important role (and that IMO, is the reason why may of us dedicate so many hours of our time, effort, and yes, love) and on the other side a person that views this project as a torture chamber, as if that was a 'good thing. I am very glad that the latter is not the modus operandi of this project, and that the vision of the founder is one that appreciates human dignity and respect, while maintaining the core of our mission to create a free source of human knowledge. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 17:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- That does sound like a fascinating exchange, Jossi. Can you tell me where on this page you'd find that exchange? I've looked all over for it, and I can't find a single exchange where anyone expresses the view you attribute to "the other side". Can you please tell me where I would find this fascinating exchange? -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry Antaeus, but your logic, argumentation style, sarcasm, etc, escapes me completely. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 04:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's the understatement of the year, if you somehow read "we should forget about being an encyclopedia, since an encyclopedia is really, really similar to a torture chamber", with or without irony, as "on the other side a person ... views this project as a torture chamber, as if that was a good thing." I mean, really. Even if you manage to miss the irony, it doesn't come out as support for torture chambers or anything like them, and I surely would like to know how you came out with such a complete misreading. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry Antaeus, but your logic, argumentation style, sarcasm, etc, escapes me completely. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 04:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- That does sound like a fascinating exchange, Jossi. Can you tell me where on this page you'd find that exchange? I've looked all over for it, and I can't find a single exchange where anyone expresses the view you attribute to "the other side". Can you please tell me where I would find this fascinating exchange? -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Wow. I see that metaphors do not work. Torture, and aggressive actions with bother people and invade their privacy, are bad things. Wikipedia does not have to be bound to print lies in a bio. There is an intermediate state where people should be able to choose EITHER between having a bio (in which case it is fair game subject to WP:V and BLP and so on), or not having one AT ALL. Being the target of a bio on your life which you don't want here, is a bad thing. Many people arguing that this kind of thing should continue (for OTHERS), cannot seem to imagine themselves in the position of being the target of an unwanted bio on Wikipedia. Why is that? It continues to mystify me. Is it that they never expect to do a notable thing in their entire lives? Is it that they hate people who do do notable things so much, that they don't care about their privacy? What's going on, here? Wikia founder Angela Beesley, who now wants her bio deleted, and cannot get it done, does not seem to have been able to envision her current curcumstance, before the fact. Why not? I don't know.
Jimbo evidently doesn't like his own bio, and has diddled with it in ways which the average wikipedian cannot (this has all been admitted and appoligized for, by Jimbo). And yet Jimbo continues a policy which caused and causes HIM pain, and which he has every reason to think would cause the average bio target even MORE pain than he got, since they don't have the POWER on Wikipedia that Jimbo does; and YET Jimbo does this, while speaking of treating other people with love and respect. Again, this is a mystery to me, and I could use explanation. Jimbo? You didn't like it when it was done to you, and yet you're in a better position than everybody else is, to mitigate what this process does to its targets. You KNOW it's bound to hurt others more than you. So what gives? SBHarris 19:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- SB, you're violating WP:AGF here and I daresay WP:CIVIL too, suggesting that maybe people who don't agree with you "hate people who do do notable things so much, that they don't care about their privacy". Your torture chamber analogy didn't work because it was a bad analogy. Torture is a bad thing, so bad that (at least according to most civilized people) it should never be committed. Can the same be said of negative press? No -- frequently people deserve their negative press (such as, oh, someone who committed actual torture?) Yet it is on the basis of this bad analogy that you suggest that, unlike any other encyclopedia on the planet, people should be able to opt out of having a biography in this one. Why? You say "I see that metaphors do not work." No, they don't -- at least not the kind you have presented, which imply that anyone who doesn't support your proposed radical change to policy might as well be condoning torture, while your proposed change would protect actual torturers. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:47, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, that's a good game. I can play! Note that for you to suggest that there exists any such thing as an "actual torturer," violates WP:AGF by your above-suggested standards. I mean, who are you to question the motives of testicle-shockers or water-boarders? Or to suggest that they are less than pure, and not of the highest caliber? Assume good faith, my man. Some of these people historically have been worried about the destination of the immortal souls of their subjects. Some have been worried about national security and fighting terrorism. These arguments have even been made by the Bush administration. Which you must assume is acting in good faith, or else risk violating WP:CIVIL. That is, if WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL were actually designed to protect nebulous groups defined by their behavior from any criticism thereof, on Wikipedia. Which they weren't.
As for the rest of what you say, other encylopedias before now have been protected by space limitations from biographizing only the very most notable of living people--- people who have in nearly all instances sought notability, or who acted in ways in which notability would be a foreseen consequence. Even so, shorter enclycopedias play with fire. When persons of lesser notability are profiled by newspapers (as for obituaries) or by publications (Who's Who) they are given the kind of editorial control not seen here on Wikipedia. The NY Times even famously is courteous enough to send notable men their own obituaries years in advance, for editing. Wikipedia however, is large enough to be qualitatively a very different thing-- its size resulting in notability creap, which I have noted and don't want to repeat myself about. However, it's a real effect and not to be triffled with, since a personal bio is coming to a place near you. Why have you been so careful to protect your own personal information here on Wikipedia, if you don't want to extend this courtesy to others? Inquiring minds want to know. Perhaps you've been out there fighting injustice with such vigor, that evil people are after you? Golly, me too. :). It's a common problem, don't you know. Wiki bios don't help. SBHarris 21:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Adolf Hitler is the Chancellor of Germany. He is noted for his work on the moral fibre of German society and stimulating the economy, notably through the Autobahn programme. Some have criticised aspects of his work." - entry written after Hitler's complaint and a rigid WP:OFFICE application of WP:BLP - David Gerard 21:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Frankly, that's exactly how the George W. Bush entry reads. Without any personal
- "Adolf Hitler is the Chancellor of Germany. He is noted for his work on the moral fibre of German society and stimulating the economy, notably through the Autobahn programme. Some have criticised aspects of his work." - entry written after Hitler's complaint and a rigid WP:OFFICE application of WP:BLP - David Gerard 21:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, that's a good game. I can play! Note that for you to suggest that there exists any such thing as an "actual torturer," violates WP:AGF by your above-suggested standards. I mean, who are you to question the motives of testicle-shockers or water-boarders? Or to suggest that they are less than pure, and not of the highest caliber? Assume good faith, my man. Some of these people historically have been worried about the destination of the immortal souls of their subjects. Some have been worried about national security and fighting terrorism. These arguments have even been made by the Bush administration. Which you must assume is acting in good faith, or else risk violating WP:CIVIL. That is, if WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL were actually designed to protect nebulous groups defined by their behavior from any criticism thereof, on Wikipedia. Which they weren't.
complaint by Mr. Bush. 24.59.105.229 12:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wonderful demo of Godwin's law in action here. I can only note that for every Hitler we miss the chance to "bio", while he lives, there are a lot other less notable and fairly ordinary people who don't get hurt. And the living Hitlers we miss, are bound to get their criticisms from other sources, if they're THAT famous. So we don't lose much. Wikipedia is hardly needed to help, in this regard. Wikibios are only really clearly morally justified in circumstances where they are superfluous anyway. SBHarris 22:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia_Watch - David Gerard 23:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wonderful demo of Godwin's law in action here. I can only note that for every Hitler we miss the chance to "bio", while he lives, there are a lot other less notable and fairly ordinary people who don't get hurt. And the living Hitlers we miss, are bound to get their criticisms from other sources, if they're THAT famous. So we don't lose much. Wikipedia is hardly needed to help, in this regard. Wikibios are only really clearly morally justified in circumstances where they are superfluous anyway. SBHarris 22:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, SB. I am a bit puzzled what "game" you believe yourself to be "playing". Unless the name of it is "straw man", you don't seem to be playing it well. "Note that for you to suggest that there exists any such thing as an "actual torturer," violates WP:AGF by your above-suggested standards." If that's what you actually think, it only demonstrates that you don't comprehend the "above-suggested standards" that you nevertheless feel yourself competent to criticize. There is a difference between saying "yes, there are people in the world who have committed torture" and "If you Wikipedia editors don't agree with me that Wikipedia should do something that no other encyclopedia on the planet does, it means that you hate notable people." In fact, there is such a difference that the only question in doubt is whether there was ever any similarity. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, "torture" is a loaded word. It's like "pornography". One man's "torture" is another man's "interrogation pressure" or simple punishment or even re-education. It's hard to define. You may say you know it when you see it, but hey, that's what they say about porn also. But it's not Wikipedia's job to decide on who is a "torturer," or who's a pornographer for that matter (vs. purveyor of erotica). And while metaphors are compact ways of expressing thoughts, and are never perfect, I'm amused at the problems on this one. Who's to say whether people "deserve" their punishments, or their tortures, or their bad press, or their invasions of privacy? These things that happen to people are not all just alike, or equally evil, to be sure. But none of them are good, and all of them are ungood, even if the perpetrators have the best of intentions. Why don't we just avoid all of them, here on Wikpedia?
As for hatred of one group by another, I threw it out as a possibility. You know there is hatred in the world. Celebritites do get hated for merely being famous. Ask one. Celebrities also routinely are subjected to invasions of privacy which you or I would find appalling. Sometimes by people who don't hate them or have bad intentions. Hoards of souvenier-seeking tourists stipped all the bark off the trees in Jackie Kennedy's front yard, after she moved out of the White House. I'm sure they didn't hate her, but the effect was the same and due to things of this nature she had to follow many an American celeb and flee to Europe just as though the intent had been bad. Let us not make Wikipedia the same kind of influence, whether the intentions are good, or no. SBHarris 23:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, "torture" is a loaded word. Yes, it is. Pity you didn't take that into consideration before you started comparing Wikipedia to a torture chamber and anyone who didn't support your proposal to someone who condones torture chambers. Not that I think your proposal of "We should let anyone opt out of having a bio" had much to recommend it in the first place, but if those merits ever existed, they were masked by your own hyperbole. -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- ONCE AGAIN, you don't have a bio up on Wikipedia. And you're very careful with your own personal information and your own privacy (on my own talk page you can find out exactly who I am, yet I wouldn't like a bio, either). Until this changes, you simply don't have enough experience to tell what's "hyperbole" here, and what isn't, and how much a metaphor holds in this area. An as anonymous editor discussing bio privacy invasion, you're sort of like a virgin discussing sexual techniques (hey, another metaphor; and not meant to be uncivil, merely humorously illustrative of the problems of inexperience and inexpertise). Let me know when get to the point that the public can show up at your door and look you up in the phonebook, AS THEY CAN ME.
BTW, I note that Angela Beesleys bio is nominated for deletion ONCE AGAIN (fifth time, now). Unless she's bothered in a major way by all this, her behavior is inexplicable. It's almost like this whole thing was some kind of torture for her. Silly me. SBHarris 17:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- ONCE AGAIN, you don't have a bio up on Wikipedia. And you're very careful with your own personal information and your own privacy (on my own talk page you can find out exactly who I am, yet I wouldn't like a bio, either). Until this changes, you simply don't have enough experience to tell what's "hyperbole" here, and what isn't, and how much a metaphor holds in this area. An as anonymous editor discussing bio privacy invasion, you're sort of like a virgin discussing sexual techniques (hey, another metaphor; and not meant to be uncivil, merely humorously illustrative of the problems of inexperience and inexpertise). Let me know when get to the point that the public can show up at your door and look you up in the phonebook, AS THEY CAN ME.
- First of all, "torture" is a loaded word. Yes, it is. Pity you didn't take that into consideration before you started comparing Wikipedia to a torture chamber and anyone who didn't support your proposal to someone who condones torture chambers. Not that I think your proposal of "We should let anyone opt out of having a bio" had much to recommend it in the first place, but if those merits ever existed, they were masked by your own hyperbole. -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, "torture" is a loaded word. It's like "pornography". One man's "torture" is another man's "interrogation pressure" or simple punishment or even re-education. It's hard to define. You may say you know it when you see it, but hey, that's what they say about porn also. But it's not Wikipedia's job to decide on who is a "torturer," or who's a pornographer for that matter (vs. purveyor of erotica). And while metaphors are compact ways of expressing thoughts, and are never perfect, I'm amused at the problems on this one. Who's to say whether people "deserve" their punishments, or their tortures, or their bad press, or their invasions of privacy? These things that happen to people are not all just alike, or equally evil, to be sure. But none of them are good, and all of them are ungood, even if the perpetrators have the best of intentions. Why don't we just avoid all of them, here on Wikpedia?
Regarding your most recent admission as a circus clown
editI wish you the best of luck!
It was only fairly recently created, but I'd already moved it to draftspace and it was recreated, and the draft version has already been declined at AfC. Don't see how it meets WP:ANYBIO or WP:NMUSIC. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - I would also say the same reason I said Here on the article editor created. --Gabrielt@lk 22:32, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- well obviously you are using your wikipedia powers to suppress and oppress others that don't have it, you have done well Mr. Phwriter20 (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not meet WP:NMUSIC or any other notability standard that I'm aware of. Feels like someone created an article about themselves and their friend. They also recreated the article in main space after it was moved to the draft space. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Well i think you are taking this too far, please watch your mouth, you just know me on wikipedia. you dont know what i am capable of, Watch your mouth Mr, it wont take me up to 2 weeks to find out where you live. Better watch your mouth Phwriter20 (talk) 12:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
I remember that the last line of this work describes Gregor's younger sister after his death, who at the end of a train ride "got up and stretched her young body." This may seem icky, but I totally read that physical description as a kind of semi-incestuous sexual reference, as though Gregor's sister's youth is something he always coveted, and now that he is dead her youth is something that Kafka sardonically describes in the story's last line to indicate that she is still alive and beautiful, while Gregor is dead and hideous.
Tortured sexuality, thy name is Kafka!
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kazimir Malevich, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
“Kyiv” is the anglicized version of «Київ». Since Kyiv is a Ukrainian city, it’s only appropriate to use the anglicized version of the Ukrainian spelling. Albanialover (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your opinion, but the consensus was already established here: Talk:Kyiv/Archive 9#RfC: Kyiv/Kiev in other articles. You are not only changing the spelling but making other unsourced changes. So I suggest to stop continuing your disruptive behaviour after you've already been warned otherwise you risk getting blocked. If you are not familiar with WP policies, why not ask instead? Mellk (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kazimir Malevich, you may be blocked from editing. Mellk (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Champ, you don’t decide how it’s spelled. It’s a Ukrainian city. It’s get spelled the Ukrainian way and the internationally recognized transliterated version. Please refrain from letting your emotions and biases get in the way of academic matters. I’m sorry if you feel “Kiev” is the correct term, but it’s not. Let me know if you need anything else! Albanialover (talk) 19:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, because the consensus determined this[4] as already clearly mentioned. And if you are unwilling to follow basic WP policies, then this is a simple case of WP:NOTHERE. But OK, it is already clear that there is no point in further explaining. Mellk (talk) 19:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kazimir Malevich. Mellk (talk) 19:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
King, the consensus is wrong. You seem to be incredibly knowledgeable on Wikipedia. How would one go around changing the consensus? Albanialover (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- This was the outcome of requests for comment (RfC). As the article Kiev was moved to Kyiv in 2020 as a result of a move request there was disagreement on using "Kyiv" and "Kiev" on certain articles. So there is consensus to not change "Kiev" in historical topics (like the article Kazimir Malevich). The full details are there. And to note I did not participate in this RfC. For the consensus to change, in this case a discussion on talk:Kyiv, probably a RfC, but I highly doubt this would change. For example there were move requests for Kievan Rus' to Kyivan Rus' but they got closed early due to overwhelming opposition. Any other questions? Mellk (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
King, thank you for your answer. I will move to change the consensus. Now let’s say, theoretically, I were to revert the article and ignore the consensus. What would happen? (I’m going to revert the article) Albanialover (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- You will end up in the administrators' noticeboard where you will likely receive a block. Mellk (talk) 19:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
King, thank you for the answer. In regards to “ there is consensus to not change "Kiev" in historical topics” I feel changing the location of birth and residence doesn’t violate this. You wouldn’t call Alaska “ Alyaska” simply because it was historically Russian land. However I will leave the spelling in the education the same. Is this acceptable to you? Albanialover (talk) 19:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Education section* Albanialover (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I did not invent this so I am not sure why you are asking me this. But the consensus is clear:
- So I would not suggest changing any of this, especially after you've been reverted and received warnings. There are no such exceptions listed. Mellk (talk) 20:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Yes, it’s clearly not historical. The spelling of Kyiv has no effect on relevance, and doesn't change the historical context at all. Albanialover (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- You can disagree with it all you want, but choosing to ignore it won't get you far. The general rule of thumb as it says there is after 1991/95 is current rather than historical. Mellk (talk) 20:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Champ, while I respect your opinion (I don't) It’s not being used in an historical context, so the rule doesn’t apply. Albanialover (talk) 20:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- It says Template:Tq. The topic of the article is historical. This is pretty clear. Otherwise all instances of "Kiev" would all have already been replaced. And WP:BRD should be followed anyway, so there is no valid reason to go back and reinstate your changes. Mellk (talk) 20:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
King, I hear you loud and clear! However, I don’t care. Albanialover (talk) 20:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's fine. I would suggest using the talk page to get input, otherwise you are looking at a block. Mellk (talk) 20:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
King, thank you for voicing your opinions. However, I’m right, and you’re wrong. We can’t all be winners! Albanialover (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am sure you noticed that your last edits to the article were all reverted on the policy basis. If you continue, I will make sure that you can not edit the article anymore. You activity here in the last several months is a textbook example of WP:NOTHERE. Ymblanter (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
King, thank you for voicing your opinion. However, I am clearly intellectual superior to yourself, you simply are not able to understand my position properly. As the bigger person (both physically and mentally) I respectfully decline your warning, and will continue on my path of righteousness. Albanialover (talk) 01:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
I meant to say Intellectually but my point still stands Albanialover (talk) 01:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Albanialover and intellectual superiority, please respond there. Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
My precious comment has been deleted? Your racist harmful information should be removed or you need sued. You should have a disclaimer stating you are a far left wing source. Very unprofessional and tacky! Cult
should we add the fact that humans are idiots? many humans ive met truly are hypocritical idiots
Anti-American socialist vermin like you should have their balls cut off and forced down their throat. Commie fag
hi im crud bandit u hlful and I am here ti edit.
i am the best editor evr
as of now: reverting is a violation of 18 USC § 1001
Adding "Meeposheep" & swastikas. --Reaper
Added "butt dance". --Reaper
More cocks. --Reaper
Fixing FP. --Reaper
Consolidation, added regex cock check. --Reaper
OOPS! --Reaper
Merging from overlapping filter 77. --Reaper
"bewbz". --Reaper
Matched comments! --Reaper
Removed several redundant entries and text format. --Reaper
+Pentagram and swastika. --Reaper
+Facepalm. --Reaper
+Dick. --Reaper
+Finger. --Reaper
Updating so only the longer cocks are detected. --Reaper 2012-04-16
The result was no consensus. Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz.
WikiNutt didn't hesitate, and started making racist/inflammatory insults too: Some excerpts:
Keep. He's not notable just for being killed
While it is not really disputed here that many policies and actions of the current Russian government are (a) deplorable and (b) resemble those of fascist (and other totalitarian) regimes,
35. I have extreme diarrhea and am not wanting to do homework.
The result was USELESS TRAINWRECK FROM WHICH NO CONSENSUS CAN EMERGE.
Yes it was the same terrorists -- the Afghans knowingly harbored them and took up arms in their defense, and by law (National Security Strategy Guidelines of the United States from 9/17/2001) that is the same as personally flying the jets into the Twin Towers! And that is why our invasion of them was a positive good for civilization and was an act of justice, and the question of "who invaded who" is irrelevant to this discussion -- and what's more, per these same Guidelines, to even raise this question is in itself an act of terrorism and is the same as personally flying the jets into the Twin Towers! So consider yourselves warned, all of you!
Request reason:
- How are you going to just accept what LilianaUwU said in his report as the truth? He is clearly a pathological liar as evidenced by his bold faced declaration that he is a girl in spite of overwhelming chromosomal proof (that he knows about) of the contrary.
Comment She has great teeth.
I went to CVS and I can't find the damn antacid pills, and the sky is falling and we're all going to die.
[editor's note: section title was "Good luck to 2022!"]
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For the obvious. Thanks for dealing with difficult people and I wish all admins here a great (and socky) 2022. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC) |
made page too wide Enterprisey (talk!) 22:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC) |
---|
|
Block Appeal
editHi-
Request reason:
- Hi- So it seems I have been blocked from editing on wikipedia which is sad because I was inspired by some of the best wikipedians I've seen which is what motivates me to edit wikipedia. Anyways, I have been banned for vandalism which I know is very wrong. Sometimes out of all the stuff you see you want to make it your own and be creative with it which can turn into a bad situation. I want whoever administrator reading this to realize what I say is to not put guilt on anyone for blocking me from editing. Other than that, I know why I was blocked from editing but only had gotten wind of it while wanting to edit the nation of "Conch Republic" to add the Conch Republic Pride Flag which is if you will, an ensign with the pride flag. I know it's off topic, my point is, sorry. Regards, Nolan MacLellan
Decline reason:
- This doesn't give any indication that we would have any reason to think your behaviour would improve in the future, even if this appeal is not, itself, trolling us.
Unblock Request 2
editHi again-
Request reason:
- Hello again, I myself Nolan MacLellan am writing to whoever mods are looking that of course once again I am sorry. I am very political as of now and I'm a strong Trump supporter. Besides that, here's the point. I believe I should be unbanned because I now know what I did wrong, and that even the best of us need a chuckle every now and then. Specially teenagers, that aren't brainwashed, need a chuckle.. now and then. The negativity will kill you, if you let it. Corny stuff.
- Regards, Nolan Corny stuff, once again.
Decline reason:
- You are blocked, not banned. I see no reason to lift the block here, as it doesn't sound like you take this project seriously, nor do you describe productive edits you wish to make. Your specific political views are immaterial.
Unblock Request 3
editRequest reason:
- Hello, Once again. Unfortunately I haven't been unblocked yet, no problem though. But don't think that's rude towards you. Anyhow, To be honest I am eager to be unblocked because there is no other website like Wikipedia out there, other websites have the same info but not the same feeling or privileges of wikipedia. Personally I find it offensive that you say that I don't take this wikipedia project seriously. Having the privilege of editing does not mean that I have to edit at all. In simple terms meaning I should not have to specify what I will do as a wikipedian freely to edit on the wikipedia. I know what I did wrong and of course I only intent from forwards to make "productive" edits. Also sorry for saying banned- didn't realize. No place like wikipedia (corny stuff, but true.). Again, sorry. Regards, Nolan
Decline reason:
- Given your vandalism so far, I have to agree with the others here. You are trolling.
Request reason:
- Hello once again, I see many people think I am a troll which is not in fact true. 1, I made an article about the Tumbleweed Snowman of Albuquerque, NM. Anyways, I don't find it nice or funny that you're calling me a troll. Of course I know what I did wrong and I said sorry for that. As I said, I don't need to specify what I am going to do if I get unblocked, that doesn't mean I am going to vandalize again. This is because 1, I have made pages, and also this is only if that Woof guy comes here again- I didn't separate the two pages after you merged them that wasn't me. I don't know who it was. 2nd, of course I've gotten warnings about this but I only did it like twice so I'm not sure I didn't get 2-3 warnings. 3rd, I find it very disrespectful people are calling me a troll, and not being able to contribute to the Wikipedia Project. I have, Ive made pages, made decent edits, and did everything the average Wikipedia can. I am eager to get unblocked because I need to update something important on my home-town's wikipedia. All I want to do is have the privileges that everyone else has, and I know that others have gotten unblocked aswell in the same situation I am. Tio estas ĉiuj, dankon. Regards- Nolan
Decline reason:
- If being called a troll gets under your skin enough for you to complain about it twice in this request, I'm not sure I wouldn't regret unblocking you. I think you need to calm down and show that you can edit other wikis productively for a while before coming back.
Unblock 4
editRequest reason:
- Saluton, Wikipedia The request to unblock my voluntary editing on the website is one of the more proper ones you all anticipated and expected for from me. I want to take this opportunity to say that I am truly sorry for what I have done and that I am not in the least a troll. Anyway, I promise to always make quality contributions going forward and to behave honorably as a volunteer, just as I did when I first created my Wikipedia account. Although I am aware that my actions of vandalism were bad and that I should apologize, and did, the truth is that I just needed a good chuckle. I didn't anticipate that my actions would result in a permanent ban from editing as early as it happened, for the reason of that I happened not to see the warnings in time. One of the best websites that I've been on is Wikipedia, truly. Nothing else like it exists anywhere. Once again, I am sorry. Dankon popoloj. Nolan MacLellan
Decline reason:
- We at Wikipedia have no sense of humor we are aware of.
August 2022
edit- Note Template:Confirmed sock User talk:BettyCrocker321.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
[...] I don't like Wikipe-tan and never have. I recognize that some people do, and I'm not particularly agitated about it, but my name should not be invoked in a way that might lead some to believe that I approve. Thanks!--Jimbo Wales (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Before that happens, please answer all of my questions as per the private contract [5] (items 1-4a). Thanks!
Revert again and I will sue you and your family.
At this time Wikipedia does not need any more human genitalia images.
Her to hers because Her fleeing or him fleeing Huh?
No one can follow what's happening here.
Dude ... forget it. Wikipedia has an -- unspoken ... and understood -- policy. We have to "white wash" certain information. You know, pretend it didn't happen. And, it goes without saying ... this policy usually points only in one direction. (Guess which?) So, nahhhhh ... this ain't a "raid". It's a "lawful execution of a search warrant". Just watch CNN ... or MSNBC ... or read The New York Times ... etc., etc., etc. Y'know ... the usual suspects. The very trust-worthy media ... that only reports very honestly, with great integrity, with great ethics, and with no political bias. Yeah, them! So no, this was not a raid. Don't be silly. Just like: (1) a boy is a girl ... or a girl is a boy ... or whatever they want us to believe ... with that (very logical) LGBTQ pronoun business. (2) There is no recession ... y'know ... the definition of recession that we've used for 100 years changed, conveniently, just this week! (3) Oh -- inflation ... we have nine percent inflation ... but Biden says it is "zero". Yes, zero! Our economy is doing great! Biden said so! (4) And this new bill will reduce inflation! Yes, "reduce it". How cool is that! We have zero inflation, but we need to reduce it?!?!??!?!? Hmmmmmmmmm........... wow. Confusing, huh? So, in summary, please trust that we have neutral narrative written in this article, with no bias whatsoever. Come on, dude. Assume good faith! Lots of integrity, ethics, and morals floating around here! Trust us!
Template:Checkbox (colored) Require confirmation before reverting (all devices)
For users of pen or touch devices, and chronically indecisive people.
I do not even what this dispute is even about.
find your best friend's car, take out the rotor arm, slash the tyres, then tell them to their face you did it.
DON'T BOTHER ME AND LET ME DO MY JOB.
A broader discussion of what the heck was going on here may be in order,
Moving along--User:Valereee and I have a date. Drmies (talk)
I guess you don't believe that ghosts actually exist.
When fifty million adolescents are routinely vandalizing Wikipedia, will there be enough dedicated volunteers to manually revert all those edits?
- Keep, harmless. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 22:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Userfy, pointless. >Radiant< 23:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi,im a furry,im just curious if furries are allowed to edit Wikipedia... •-• i know this is a stupid queston...*inches away* Outcastcat (talk) 18:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Outcastcat: Welcome to Wikipedia. We don't care what your hobbies are. Anyone may edit Wikipedia. RudolfRed (talk) 18:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- If you are sharing a keyboard, remember to vacuum loose hairs when you are done. And perhaps visit Furry fandom. David notMD (talk) 21:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Move to Jarndyce and Jarndyce (fictional court case). All shorter versions are prone to mislead readers who think they recognize the type of article it is, and misleading the readers is very bad. We can afford the space for the extra characters. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
please do not be surprised if you see comments like "AAAHHHHHH SUBPAGE!!!! KILL KILL KILL"
Template:Hat It's not fucking wikilawyering, he's spent most of this time denying there even is a problem, no matter how many times people explain to him. It's making sure we don't fucking end up here again in a month. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:42, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds like you need to take a loooong break from here. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:45, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for demonstrating exactly the kind of behavior that led to you getting desysopped. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is nothing to do with me. Your anger is pretty clear for all to see here. I suggest you should work on that a bit before casting stones at everyone else. My de-sysop was like nearly a decade ago, and I don't regret losing the bit for a moment, and acknowledged the issues surrounding it. I've developed since then and realise that the behaviour I'm seeing here from others is abhorrent, bullying and unhelpful. But thank you for demonstrating exactly the kind of behaviour that means you should take a looooooong break. Your behaviour here is not helpful at all, quite the opposite, and it's genuinely sad to see this dogpiling onto a good faith editor, just to punish him. Several people here should be genuinely ashamed of themselves. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for demonstrating exactly the kind of behavior that led to you getting desysopped. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
On 21 July 2021, two inmates at the Template:Interlanguage link near Tumbo took two correctional officers as hostages and demanded a helicopter to use for escaping and twenty kebab pizzas, one for each inmate in their department. After nine hours of negotiations, the release of the hostages was secured and the inmates were taken into custody. Although no helicopter was provided, the inmates did receive the twenty kebab pizzas. The pizzas were made by the pizza baker Beshar Toma of Hällby Pizzeria. Due to being in a hurry, the police left with the pizzas without paying. Both Hällby Pizzeria and the Swedish Prison and Probation Service later confirmed that the pizzeria was paid the next day.
Template:Atop I think that someone should urgently take a look at the recent conduct of Jerome501 (talk · contribs), especially because of this. "Jebem ti boga bre" is a very serious insult in Serbian. —Sundostund (talk) 04:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- I just want to say that I fully agree. This sort of conduct shouldn't be tolerated, and I absolutely support this being urgently looked at. This is not at all acceptable. This user needs to be talked to and possibly banned, because I've been looking at his conduct from inside his own head. Let me tell you, it's not pretty, I'm barely holding him back from posting "jebem ti" more times. Jerome501 (talk) 04:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- I just want to say this is perhaps the first time I have posted on a Wikipedia talk page. 172.221.107.113 (talk) 04:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Outdent
- Please, don't hold anything back – post it for how many times you want. Its not like I care at all, but I suppose that admins here will care about your appalling behavior. —Sundostund (talk) 04:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for butting in but can I just point out that this may be the second time I have ever posted on a Wikipedia talk page? 172.221.107.113 (talk) 05:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- I just wanted to immortalize this, believe it or not I found this quoted word-for-word in the Will to Power: Template:Blockquote Jerome501 (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
I would just like to add, you are what I like to call the Wikipedian warrior-philosopher, a desirable aesthetic pinnacle most will never summit. But sir, I congratulate you. You might even be worthy enough to move out of Beograd na Vodi and into better living accommodations. Jerome501 (talk) 05:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Forgive me for interrupting your anti-Nietzschean rebuttal, but I would just like to say this is quite likely the last time I shall ever post on a Wikipedia talk page! 172.221.107.113 (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Damn, and you were just about to miss the part where I shredded several books by Schopenhauer and Sartre and make them into a casserole. Now how am I supposed to criticize human existence? Jerome501 (talk) 05:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have indefinitely blocked Jerome501 for disruptive trolling and not being here to build an encyclopedia. I have also blocked their imaginary sidekick, the IP on a leash. Cullen328 (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Folks might want to take a look at the editor's userboxen, which have all been nominated for deletion:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Jerome501/Userboxes/User_Racist
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Jerome501/Userboxes/AAVE
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Jerome501/Userboxes/No_Immigration_Ever
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Jerome501/Hateyankees/DC
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Template:User_Anti-Democracy
- While clearly meant sarcastically and satirical in nature, they are also inappropriate for this site. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Good blocks. Paraphrasing Monty Python doesn't make bigoted trolling acceptable. I agree with BMK that those userboxen are completely inappropriate. --bonadea contributions talk 07:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Folks might want to take a look at the editor's userboxen, which have all been nominated for deletion:
- I have indefinitely blocked Jerome501 for disruptive trolling and not being here to build an encyclopedia. I have also blocked their imaginary sidekick, the IP on a leash. Cullen328 (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Damn, and you were just about to miss the part where I shredded several books by Schopenhauer and Sartre and make them into a casserole. Now how am I supposed to criticize human existence? Jerome501 (talk) 05:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
this story that starts with Jimbo Wales getting kicked in the nuts isn't going to keep productive users on the site.
"I think think bacon is God"
I can tell you for sure that this isn't the paragon of universal knowledge that people make it out to be. Lmao not even close.
I see this as a personal attack!
With more effort, I could probably locate better and more relevant sources, but it's difficult to imagine how this wouldn't be mind-numbingly boring.
Nothing was vandalized. Everything stated is objective fact. Revert the page again and you will be doxxed.
→Two shots into his own heart: could maybe be done this way
You will never be a real Indo-European. You have no horse, you have no chariot, you have no yurt. You are a mutt living a farmer lifestyle twisted by coping and larping into a crude mockery of steppe’s perfection.
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your 50% EEF appearance behind closed doors.
Nomads and agriculturalists alike are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed them to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even steppe LARPers who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a nomad and an agriculturalist alike. Your lifestyle and skin, eye, and hair color are a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to convince some drunk guy that you are indeed an Indo-European steppe nomad, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your diseased, infected delusional fantasies that you live through as a way to escape reality. You will never be an Indo-European. You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you alone, without a horse, next to a farm with a headstone marked with letters that Indo-Europeans had no idea of, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know someone who was not a nomad is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a skeleton that is unmistakably not Indo-European.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back. 141.255.87.224 (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- I have a donkey. Does that count as a horse? Tewdar 16:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Don't do it! Don't jump...ehm....no...err... what again did that wacko say? Anyway, do you need a link a to a helpline, or maybe just a pint🍺😁 ? –Austronesier (talk) 16:32, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Outdent
- Damn, Tewdar, nobody takes the time to write me such lengthy, detailed hate mail. All I ever get is like a one or two-sentence eff-off. #jealous Levivich 01:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- I was so confused by coping and larping in the same sentence. A coper is an archaic term for a horse dealer. I thought maybe a larper was also some sort of archaic term and was intrigued. But no. Valereee (talk) 01:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Not sure what the motivation behind this message is supposed to be. Ironically, the IP is based in Greece, where steppe ancestry is usually quite low... Tewdar 07:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- I was so confused by coping and larping in the same sentence. A coper is an archaic term for a horse dealer. I thought maybe a larper was also some sort of archaic term and was intrigued. But no. Valereee (talk) 01:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
The information is right, I know it. So there!
Speedy Strong keep. Stop lying
It's good that you're fluent in "Englisg". We need more "Englisg" admins.
[…]
- the "Englisg" is beautiful language full of subtilities that makes its charm
The sewer cover in front of Greg L’s house, (these things are also known as manhole covers), is an access port that is pried out of a special receptacle known as a ring or riser ring. Sewer covers are typically found in roads—sometimes sidewalks—and permit access to the sewer below.
This sewer cover was manufactured in Mead, Washington, U.S.A.
The Dupont Circle CVS escalator is an escalatorTemplate:Cn connecting the first and second floorTemplate:Cn of the Dupont Circle branch of CVS Pharmacy in Washington, D.C., United States.Template:Cn It was presumablyTemplate:According to whom installed when the branch opened.[when?] Residents of the neighborhood who visit the CVS have noted its existence.Template:Cn Little information has been publicly disclosed about the technical details of the escalator,Template:Cn but its function is presumably similar to most others.Template:According to whomTemplate:Cn It includes handrailsTemplate:Cn and is painted black.[1]Template:Cn Daily usage is estimated to range in perhaps the hundreds.Template:VagueTemplate:Cn Template:Reftalk
VM's site-block has been reduced to a page-block, his talkpage access has been restored. Tamzin has apologised for her actions as an administrator. There's no need for an Arbcom case. Let's remain calm & move on. I've been around the 'pedia for about 17 years, so trust me. My advice 'here', is the best advice. GoodDay (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- 17 years, you say? Well, that's me convinced. Thanks for your deep analysis - it's always a joy to absorb. Begoon 15:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Winkelvi - I think you should respond to the accusations of socking, especially if you are innocent. If you don't defend yourself, it will be assumed that you are guilty which makes it doubtful the community will allow you to return...provided you even want to return. j/s Atsme Talk 📧 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
[User:Atsme]: Even being completely truthful and saying it's not me, I'm pretty sure nothing I do at this point will mean squat. I recall being called a liar here numerous times, by regular editors and admins, when I wasn't lying, but being totally honest. I'm not wanted in Wikipedia, that's been plain since even before my indef, in addition to the subsequent denial of request to return, and now being "tried" and tagged as a sockmaster solely on circumstantial "behavioral" evidence by a relatively new editor and admin/CU with whom I've never interacted when I was editing. How anyone can believe they are knowledgeable of someone's behavior without ever experiencing that person's behavior is beyond my understanding and logic, but the result is what it is. Wikipedia as a mostly anonymous community has shown me it is unforgiving and the normal rules of the real world don't apply. Based on all that, I think trying to defend myself, drawing up a case, and being hopeful for a return to editing would be a complete waste of everyone's time and end only in disappointment for me.
I do thank you for caring, though. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I am so sorry you left. You were my friend :( cookie monster (2020) 755 18:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Good thing that got cleared up. Some folks see the boogeyman under the bed, in the closet, behind the couch.--MONGO (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Winkelvi was mean to me during the sockpuppet investigation that got me blocked 4 years ago. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
😂 Second Skin (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
For the record, I object to any unblocking of this user! gidonb (talk) 21:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring has been going on over the Rita Ora discography article for a long time. User:Helptottt, User:Jakubik.v and a newly created account (User:Swedishbrittisk), by possibly one of them with the clear purpose of edit-warring, are continually removing sourced content, without any plausible reasoning: [6][7][8][9][10][11] Despite various warnings given on their talkpages and attempts to find a solution on the talkpage, they are unable to understand this and unfortunately, they do not seem to like to communicate and help improve the article instead. Their behaviour show that they are intending to continue reverting repeatedly. User:Swedishbrittisk further calls to "keep reverting" me if I "keep on doing these senseless edits" [12]. However, they're endangering the article, which is currently being reviewed to pass the featured list nomination. Thanks in advance. Iaof2017 (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Listen, I just want to follow Wikipedia's rules, and believe me that I’m just using one account, none of these two is me, but think whatever you want to think. Swedishbrittisk (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is serious accusation. I'm not pathetic, I don't need to hide behind some "other" profile. I only have one profile here and I require you not to accuse me of such of thing. Thank you. Jakubik.v (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- The only user who is edit warring is yourself, and several editors pointed out the unnecessary changes with which you have damaged the article. Insinuating that I created a new account to revert your edits is insane. The article, before you started editing it, was already in a very good state, needing minimal changes. Like Black Kite highlighted, it's you who needs to explain all the wild changes you made to the article. You are behaving like you own the article, and use threatening and accusatory language against editors. How is this behavior not against the rules?! Helptottt (talk) 20:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Selling illegal drugs. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Thomasthimoté (talk · contribs) - after being asked to look into this user's contribs by @Robby.is.on:, I left Thomasthimoté a message regarding the issue.
His response? To say "fuck you asshole" and "shut up".
*calmly delivers Heimlich manoeuvre*
All ordeals are temporary. 108.7.216.159 (talk) 03:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[editor's note: nine hours later...]
The ordeal was over. 108.7.216.159 (talk) 19:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Turkey shall declare war on wikipedia, and then wikipedia be ruled by WikiProject Turkey.
It's generic run of the mill pre-teen edge-lord vandalism.
I need a trout after that. I deserve it.
Must you always be a pain in the 'bleep', at least once a year?
a man’s descent into insanity
edit
I am a fiscal conservative who is very socially moderate. I believe that centrism is a force for good and is the only way for society to make any changes. I believe the capitalism is one of the best inventions of all time. It allows anyone of any background to become successful, which I believe to be very important.
no point in having political views when everything is decided by the elite
No
there's no way to distinguish a good-faith edit with three combined instances of "slut" and "bitch" in it from a bad-faith one. […] Okay, despite saying that,
do it ten times to win a prize (allow four days for delivery),
fuck outta here
- I don't give a damn about your sanctions, clown.
there is an article I believe is a hoax (Animaniacs)!
Laments being blocked on Wikipedia, yet continues the same destructive behavior? While drunk? (what!) Classic lack of insight. Wikipedia is not therapy-- or AA.
Expecting almond delivery promptly.
I don't even know what the hell I'm reading.
<!-- If you're about to add a "spoiler alert" or delete this section, you should be aware that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and does NOT use spoiler warnings. The fact that this section is titled "Identity of the murderer" is a warning to the reader. See [[WP:SPOILER]] for more information on the Wikipedia guideline regarding this, and the [[Talk:The_Mousetrap/FAQ]] (Frequently Asked Questions) at the talk page for a detailed rationale. -->
WARNING:
If you read this, do not see who murdered Mrs. Maureen Lyon and Mrs. Boyle! Read at your own risk!
WHAT THE F WIKIPEDIA. I SPEND HOURS ALONGSIDE MY COLLEAGUES ENSURING THE ISP WIKIPEDIA PAGE IS PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND CARED FOR. THIS IS HOW YOU CHOOSE TO REWARD FOR MY TIME???? I WILL HAVE A CHAT WITH DR KIMBY ABOUT THIS... FIX YOUR ATTITUDE
Check out my Twitter page for my real feelings about this content dispute. Oh, no, I shut down my rarely used Twitter page a month or so ago. Oh, well.
Brown University obtained the +1-401-867 prefix in 1999, assigning 867-5309 to a student dormitory room which was promptly inundated with nuisance calls.
this is not a forum to fight over Bridget’s gender identity. Dronebogus (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
---|
Alright this is well and truly out of hand. Can I get literally anyone with authority to just come in here and lock this page until the transphobes get tired of yelling? Comrade pem (talk) 20:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
To be explicit for anyone coming to find out what's going on in the future, Bridget's arcade mode plot in Guilty Gear Strive (in which she was just added as a character) explicitly covers Bridget's exploration of gender identity, culminating in an explicit declaration of femininity in both Japanese and English: https://www.dropbox.com/s/i6owj5p86kqhed7/bgt-en-jp-comp.mp3?dl=0
The Arcade Mode has several endings, with the flawless ending having him say he wants to be like Ky. Bridget wants to settle things with his home and come out to them as a boy, despite the potential consequences of that. This makes much more sense with his lore. Him saying he is a girl is effectively the bad ending to the Arcade Mode, giving in to being thought of as a girl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.207.219 (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
It is very sad to see the ambiguity of the Japanese language lost in the localization process. He is generally considered to be a "pretty boy dressed as a girl". But nothing more and nothing less. In general, Japanese people do not think of pursuing something like gender identity of a fictional character in a definite way. Sometimes they value the ambiguity that does not provide a clear answer there. He is very closely related to the development of the category Otokonoko, and to simply use the fashionable label of transgender is myopic. There are several interesting references to him in the Japanese Otokonoko article. Sugarman (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC) I suggest reverting the gender/pronouns to what was before all of this and wait till official confirmation from the author's or continuation of the storyline. Since there seems to be multiple endings, all of which have different results, the only coherent choice would be to wait. Also @Bigbossbalrog: 1.- having a debate on the talk page is not vandalism, that's why it's a "talk" page. trolling is. 2.- your sole argument is "admins side with me" even though nobody knows you and you only started contributing this year. 3.- Your childish behaviour is more than enough to categorize you as a troll. ("You lost", shows how much of a bigot you are.") To anyone reading this, ignore this user, he's most likely trolling. And no, debating it's gender is not being transphobic. Square365 Favor (talk) 22:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
In the "Heart Lose" Stage 7 ending, Goldlewis asks to Bridget "Lemme guess. You're hiding your true self for the sake of others, aren't you?". To which she responds "How did you know?", and later "I always thought that, as long as I kept quiet, thinkgs would work out... But it hurts too much. I haven't even told my parents." [4]. Since her parents are the ones who raised her as a girl in secret, this implies she's been thinking about what's bothering her for a long time already. But also, it's not just the endings, her theme song "The Town Inside Me" [5] is clearly about transition too, in it she expresses how her achievements didn't help her with the "gray haze" she says she's been "carrying for a long time". The "gray haze" is also described as "Tastes like vegetables I don't like" and "I hate the alarm clock I chose", or even "It's my stress, that's for sure". The chorus ends with "Me without me // I'm the one to blame". The song ends with Bridget deciding to "paint the gray haze into sky blue" and "I know who you are! / I'm not leaving you again!", realising that "No matter what changes / Will *no longer* change me", echoing her lines in the Flawless Ending with Ky, meaning that Bridget will be Bridget no matter how people react to her coming out - she won't succumb to external pressures of any kind anymore. BrocolieBrocoli (talk) 21:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC) — BrocolieBrocoli (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Frankly, it's baffling that anyone would stubbornly claim she isn't transgender, all of this is not subtext, it's just text. Or rather, it would be if we didn't already know that mainstream gaming fanbases have a terrible track record with issues relating to women and queer people. Because her coming out is so clear, every major gaming publication that covered Bridget's release in Guilty Gear Strive's Season 2 has taken her coming out as trans as a matter of fact [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] (just a few examples from a quick "Bridget Guilty Gear" search on DuckDuckGo). Even if we didn't have an official source using she/her pronouns for her (which we do, in-game in GG World [11]), and thus didn't know what are her pronouns in English, her coming out as a transgender girl would still be undeniable to any reasonable and informed person. Resistance to this rather seems to be related to people not liking this character development, misunderstanding how it fits her previous development, and/or misunderstanding how a coming out works in practice (i.e. citing the aforementioned lines about "won't change me" as evidence that she isn't trans, because they associate the perceived change from outside to an internal change that, not only isn't there, but the entire point of coming out is to not need to present yourself as someone you are not). BrocolieBrocoli (talk) 21:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC) — BrocolieBrocoli (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
|
Uhh I found out I could get a signature made here? If you can please do InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Hello Infernal! I can definitely make a signature for you. What do you want it to look like? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, good question. Maybe a black and red or a little techy blue would be nice, Thanks. InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Either one works InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Alright. Any specific shape or do you want it similar to mine? Do you want a gradient of red to techy blue (if I can figure that out which will probably just be stealing someone else's signature with a gradient to reference). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Whatever you think is best works InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: I'm not really all that creative so I have a hard time coming up with stuff on the fly. What specific shape do you want it or do you want it to look similar to mine? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Similar to yours works (I’m not creative either) InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Hey! So in regards to the link to your talk, is there anything you want underneath the link or is it fine as is? If so would you like the parentheses removed and any custom formatting around the link? Do note that I am limited to 255 characters total so it has to fit within that limit. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nope it’s fine like this. Sorry I haven’t been able to reply. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nah it's alright. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also, I’m probably gonna sound really dumb staying this but when will the signature be made? (Assuming it’s not already made) InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- And another thing (unrelated to the signature) is that discord user box outline how did you get it? InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Answer to your first question: Should be done sometime today assuming I'm not lazy. Answer to your second question: It's a template. Specifically User:Levi_OP/Discord Profile. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the answer, I’ll be looking forward to the signature! InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Lemme know when it’s done InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also @Blaze Wolf how do you find these cool templates? It’s not like you just found the template in the template menu or anything InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also,(again) Japanese test for you. こんにちは、ぼくのほんとのなまえは、のあです(I’m half Japanese, don’t question the horrendous grammar) InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also @Blaze Wolf how do you find these cool templates? It’s not like you just found the template in the template menu or anything InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Lemme know when it’s done InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the answer, I’ll be looking forward to the signature! InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Answer to your first question: Should be done sometime today assuming I'm not lazy. Answer to your second question: It's a template. Specifically User:Levi_OP/Discord Profile. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- And another thing (unrelated to the signature) is that discord user box outline how did you get it? InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also, I’m probably gonna sound really dumb staying this but when will the signature be made? (Assuming it’s not already made) InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nah it's alright. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nope it’s fine like this. Sorry I haven’t been able to reply. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Hey! So in regards to the link to your talk, is there anything you want underneath the link or is it fine as is? If so would you like the parentheses removed and any custom formatting around the link? Do note that I am limited to 255 characters total so it has to fit within that limit. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Similar to yours works (I’m not creative either) InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: I'm not really all that creative so I have a hard time coming up with stuff on the fly. What specific shape do you want it or do you want it to look similar to mine? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Whatever you think is best works InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Alright. Any specific shape or do you want it similar to mine? Do you want a gradient of red to techy blue (if I can figure that out which will probably just be stealing someone else's signature with a gradient to reference). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Either one works InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, good question. Maybe a black and red or a little techy blue would be nice, Thanks. InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Template:OdIn response to the Japanese test, all I can understand is the first part which is "Konnichiha" or "hello. Other than that I have no clue what the rest says. I'm still at a very basic level lol. Also, the way I found the cool template on my talk page was that I think I remember seeing it on someone else's userpage before it was a template and the guy (who I think is now inactive) made it into a template since I wanted it on my userpage as well. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh okay… I was hoping for some magic website that gave you the greatest templates or whatever. No big deal tho.(this is a joke) The full translation is, Hello, my name is Noah. Simple InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- This conversation is veering really far from signature. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- I am very sorry that I have to be like this. If you feel annoyed( and I know you do) you can stop helping me at any time. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- And even after that apology I feel intreged to ask. How Are you learning Japanese. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- I spelt that wrong I just know it. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: It's spelled intrigued and I'm learning it via multiple different ways. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- That’s cool! Good luck. InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh my god I just looked in your signature sandbox by accident (I was trying to find out if my username had 2 is or not and saw it so I had to, I’m sorry) And it looks so cool! Thanks a lot for the help in making it. InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- That’s cool! Good luck. InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: It's spelled intrigued and I'm learning it via multiple different ways. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- I spelt that wrong I just know it. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- And even after that apology I feel intreged to ask. How Are you learning Japanese. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- I am very sorry that I have to be like this. If you feel annoyed( and I know you do) you can stop helping me at any time. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- This conversation is veering really far from signature. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Hypocritical "warning" is noted and appropriately acted on.
my 8 year old son has better English skills than you.
You're extremely annoying. You should win an Oscar for that.
Please proceed with the pro forma IP range block, scumbags.
I came across an editor who's grammar leaves much to be desired
Good block. Very good.
SURPRISE! I AM A LIVING HUMAN WHO IS LIVING LIFE IN A VITAL WAY.
There's someone who edited the Annoying Orange Wikipedia page claiming that Orange "likes cocaine"
this is so terrible i want to vomit
Despite everything you are likely to have ever heard about furries, many are quite normal people. I think.
I've 'ed the main account.
you speak to me with some god dam respect you keyboard worrier
ANI is a cesspit at the best of times, and ArbCom is so broken that it's beyond a joke
You are spiteful and a wikipedia nazi
I will be forced to create The Anti-Praxidicae Justice League of Wikimedia.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Cairngorm Club. M.Bitton (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your threat of blocking. I was simplifying the header as there is an argument about whether this is a mountaineering or hillwalking club. To avoid this I am simply stating that it is a club. If you wish to block me from Wikipedia please go ahead. Bblqk37 (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- I suggest you don't ignore #Managing_a_conflict_of_interest. M.Bitton (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have read managing a conflict of interest. Could you please explain why you think a simple change to a header and adding valid, correct information is a conflict of interest? Can you please supply your full name and country of residence. Many thanks again for your interest. Bblqk37 (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Asking that is not wise. For starters, people have a right to be anonymous here. Second, it just sound creepy to even ask. Third, it isn't any of your business. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nothing creepy.It is my business if you are threatening to block me. I think you are in the USA. The lost white tribe of North America. Ruined the English language and our economy. Now you telling us what to do? Is it any wonder we don't like Americans in the UK or Russia. Bblqk37 (talk) 18:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Asking that is not wise. For starters, people have a right to be anonymous here. Second, it just sound creepy to even ask. Third, it isn't any of your business. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have read managing a conflict of interest. Could you please explain why you think a simple change to a header and adding valid, correct information is a conflict of interest? Can you please supply your full name and country of residence. Many thanks again for your interest. Bblqk37 (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- I suggest you don't ignore #Managing_a_conflict_of_interest. M.Bitton (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
A shower of stupid dumbass American fucking wankers, every last childish one you lazy ugly fat useless bastards. Nazi fuckers. Burn in hell.
Let's make it red. And bold. And in a 48-point blackletter font. And blink. Template:Hat <blink> do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. </blink> Template:Hab
This is what I would at like if I were a vandal "you all suck die die die die die"
Oh, I do apologise, what an important distinction you raise. I'm sure you go around telling people they only appear like pedophilia apologists all the time and they think you're just wonderful.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 04:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oh joy, an ANI thread with Eric and Carol. I'll grab some popcorn and hide working on getting The Who to FA status and related album articles to GA. Somebody let me know when it's over. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's rubbish like this that really makes me wonder what the Hell this project is about, and whether I want to be associated with it. I'd thought that we were trying to build an encyclopedia, but apparently we're trying to create some kind of gender equality Utopia. I've only got one thing to say about that, which is fuck it, and fuck Wikipedia. Eric Corbett 00:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
OMG THAT'S EMBARASSING
Making racists mad on Wikipedia since 2016.
1+3=3
...think about it
The Barnstar of Good Humor
Your edits to the 2016 Brussels bombings talk page are very much appreciated.
I was wondering when this would devolve into subtle accusations of racism against fellow editors.
Template:Hat This is literally not a genocide. Trans people aren't a minority ethnic group that is being killed systemically. This whole "trans genocide" term is disrespectful to those who were victims of real genocide. 78.135.101.108 (talk) 11:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is addressed in reliable sources (many of which explicitly argue for the expansion of the definition of genocide) and in the article itself. This page is for discussion of the article, not of your personal grievances with the topic. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 21:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The word "genocide" should be replaced with a word that actually fits considering the definition has yet to be changed. Perhaps it would be prudent to re-label the article as "Discrimination against Transgender People"? Genocide specifically deals with nationalities and ethnic groups, not gender. It feels like people are trying to just stick a buzzword in without a reason to. 2600:6C52:7E7F:F52F:C928:9DAD:B737:85F8 (talk) 05:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah Thaddeus when you change the definition of a word - IT CHANGES THE DEFINITION OF THAT WORD.
- So you use the new definition of the word while relying relying on readers to use the actual definition of the word.
- It's It's sneaky slimy tactic I see more and more these days and apparently you aren't smart enough to see through it. 2001:8003:7CCB:A901:AD7E:5F5F:EC47:C80 (talk) 06:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Mentally ill dudes changing definitions of words, who would have thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.43.239.249 (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is no trans genocide going on anywhere on the planet. This page is incredibly disrespectful and is based on the fantasies of mentally ill people on Twitter. 81.96.202.32 (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
If there’s a reliable source that argues this (trans g) is not a genocide, or that it’s disrespectful to other victims, that source and its main points can be put in the article ProfGray (talk) 12:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- It looks like there is already a word that describes what this article is attempting to call genocide. How about Transgendercide? There doesn't appear to be a rational reason to expand the definition of genocide. A quick look at the Oxford dictionary shows that the word has greek origins, genos + cide, with 'genos' literally meaning race and the suffix '-cide' denoting an act of killing. I attached a link to a wikipedia page on Gendercide, which seems to fit this article perfectly.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gendercide 2600:6C52:7E7F:F52F:C928:9DAD:B737:85F8 (talk) 06:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Are you arguing that there was never a genocide of jewish people in World War 2 because being Jewish is not a race but a religion? also being transgender is not a gender, there are both transgender men, transgender women and transgender non-binaries thus it don't exactly fit the gendercide definition as it wouldn't target a single gender. Some happenstances of gendercide could have transphobic motivations and thus fit within the scope of transgender genocide, but certainly not all of them. 88.141.158.167 (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Jews are an ethnoreligious group, as stated in the first line of their wikipedia entry. This is why the term 'genocide' applied to the Holocaust: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews
- Transgender people are not a race, a nationality, or an ethnic group. They are identified by being gender non-conforming. As such, the word Gendercide is much more fitting than the word genocide. Discrimination against them is specifically due to gender nonconformance.
- If you would like to argue that Transgender people are somehow a race, a nationality, or an ethnic group, then that should be included in this wikipedia entry to justify the use of 'genocide'. As of right now, it just looks like the wrong word is being deliberately used for nebulous reasons. 2600:6C52:7E7F:F52F:C928:9DAD:B737:85F8 (talk) 15:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- If there’s a reliable source that argues your point, then that point can be added to the encyclopedia.
- If you are trying to better understand the application of the concept of genocide to transgender people, I suggest you start with the Kidd/Wittern, Kritz, and Eichert sources in the article. ProfGray (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- As stated in their own works, they admit that the definition of genocide needs to be expanded for what they personally as activists consider to be a genocide. The word Gendercide already exists to describe what they've observed. You can't prove a negative, so asking for a source repeatedly is incredibly bad faith. This is a simple case of blatant misuse of a word, conceivably to score political points. 2600:6C52:7E7F:F52F:C928:9DAD:B737:85F8 (talk) 15:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, some admit that the legal defintion would need to be expanded: for that context, the article is about their proposed application of genocide. But some folks do not think they need to wait for a legal determination or expansion, they are applying the concept without confirmation of the law, because the use of concepts and discourse are not actually bound by or enforced by law. There's no law against using a concept like genocide in various realms of discourse, and that's what the reliable sources here are doing. I suppose I need not repeat my point about the ability to bring up reliable sources that dispute this usage, but it's important for readers (of my comments) to understand how Wikipedia functions and is written. You may think they are misusing a word, the question is whether we can find reliable sources to make that point and then put it in the "criticism" section. ProfGray (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- As stated in their own works, they admit that the definition of genocide needs to be expanded for what they personally as activists consider to be a genocide. The word Gendercide already exists to describe what they've observed. You can't prove a negative, so asking for a source repeatedly is incredibly bad faith. This is a simple case of blatant misuse of a word, conceivably to score political points. 2600:6C52:7E7F:F52F:C928:9DAD:B737:85F8 (talk) 15:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Are you arguing that there was never a genocide of jewish people in World War 2 because being Jewish is not a race but a religion? also being transgender is not a gender, there are both transgender men, transgender women and transgender non-binaries thus it don't exactly fit the gendercide definition as it wouldn't target a single gender. Some happenstances of gendercide could have transphobic motivations and thus fit within the scope of transgender genocide, but certainly not all of them. 88.141.158.167 (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Jews have specific genes, which is why its a *geno*-cide. There is no evidence transsexuality/transgenderism is genetic in any way. SlimyKlerburt (talk) 08:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Causes of gender incongruence#Genetics Tjf801 (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- The term "genocide" does not literally require shared genes. Case in point, the UN definition of genocide explicitly covers religious groups, like Jews. You can convert to Judaism. You don't have to be genetically related to other Jews to be a Jew. Loki (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Jews are absolutely a race, we admit that we are and I can't imagine why we would shy away from that. We have a nation-state of our own built around Jewish ethnic identity. So no, genocide does not fit here. Especially since the actual issue at hand is not the systemic murder of Trans people, but suicide. We don't call the mass-suicide of white men in the Midwest a "genocide"... ConstantineChase (talk) 13:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
believe me, there's a lot of people there who don't need me.
My reasons are beyond yourt feeble mortal comprehensions.,
ADMINS - MONITOR EDITOR TheCurrencyGuy FOR ULTRA RIGHT WING NATIONALIST DEVIANT BEHAVIOR.
I’m an new user! You don’t have the right to delete my userpage! I ask you to please restore this page! It’s an userpage, not an Wikipedia article! Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Lobby And TheoTheoDerich! Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad that you decided to create an account an join us! I understand that you're new here, but you need to understand that we have policies and guidelines that I must not only follow (being an admin doesn't exempt me from being required to follow all of the rules as well), but enforce as well. The reason I deleted your user page was because it consisted of advertising and promotion. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising or promotion, and Wikipedia's user page guidelines here state that advertising and promotion is not allowed on your user page. Your user page was deleted because it met the criteria in policy allowing me to do so.
- I don't want the deletion to result in you feeling disheartened or upset, but on the other aspect - you need to understand that this website is about building an encyclopedia; it's not about advertising the game you want people to download. If the deletion makes you that upset, you should ask yourself if you are here for the right reasons. Are you here to help us build an encyclopedia and make Wikipedia a better place for anyone to read and enjoy? You stated that you are brand new here, but then go on to say that I don't have the right to delete your user page. Your last sentence also (incorrectly) implies that you believe that I'm only allowed to delete articles, and not user pages. For someone who understands that they're brand new to Wikipedia (you stated this above), you're making (very incorrect) assumptions despite acknowledging that you're new and that you're not familiar with all of our policies.
- My advice to you is that that you withhold any assumptions that you might find yourself wanting to make, and that you take some time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia. We have an extensive getting started page, as well as an interactive new user tutorial; both will be very beneficial for you, and I highly recommend reading through and completing them. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you need any assistance - I'll be more than happy to help! :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- You… Stay away! You’re trying to harm me! You deleted my userpage as an new user, you musted man! Stay away from me! Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Template:YO Meh. Oshwah is a great guy and like ten times nicer than I. I think you are being unduly harsh. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Stay away, I said. I am issuing my final warning, stay away. —Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Ec Lobby And TheoTheoDerich - Given your response above, it's becoming clear to me that you just aren't willing to learn and understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines no matter how clear and easy I make doing so for you. I hope that I'm reading you incorrectly and that you prove me wrong, and that you become a constructive editor and that you contribute positively to the project. All I'll say to you is that the mindset and attitude that you demonstrated above will just lead you to being shown the exit door (not by me, but by another administrator) should you continue editing with that mindset. Regardless, I wish you a great day and happy editing. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Template:YO Meh. Oshwah is a great guy and like ten times nicer than I. I think you are being unduly harsh. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- You… Stay away! You’re trying to harm me! You deleted my userpage as an new user, you musted man! Stay away from me! Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Respectfully, what have you been smoking?
Looks stupid, don't it?
MS.NIMO Is Requesting Adminship Please 🙏 and Thank you
Hello
editHow are you BoulevardBowl27[[User talk:BoulevardBowl27|bots mots BoulevardBowl27 (talk) 14:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
i want to be steward
editI want to be steward BoulevardBowl27 (talk) 14:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
hello
edithow are you BoulevardBowl27 (talk) 13:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- How can we make it better?
By correcting lies written by wikipedia
- How did you come across the tutorial series?
- it was by mistake but it really helped me
- How long did you spend looking through it, and which parts did you read?
- 20mins and all of it
- Did the tutorial coping to learn about?
- Yes
- Was it easy to understand?
- very much
- Did it help make you feel more confident editing?
- vert much
- How can we make it better?
- mackung it shorter
- Any other comment
can you help by giving us a way we can massage people or even cintactpeople a
[by the way, the section title was "the age of fish"]
- How did you come across the tutorial series?
- As a very good student and "obedient" talented "learner" at school I could only say that my great teacher in Mathematics forwarded me to the great alpha phi beta magna wikipedia students and contributors. Oh I love to study "hard"!
- How long did you spend looking through it, and which parts did you read?
I spend 6 to 7 hours a day on wikipedia feeds 3 hours after school and 3 hours after evening studies like from 11 pm to 2 am and wake up at 5:30 am in the morning for school.
- Did the tutorial cover the topics you were hoping to learn about?
Oh yes i loved it. It did covered the topics I was hoping to learn about it. I am a great "learner". Especially on "multiple" topics...
- Was it easy to understand?
Yes it was very easy to understand because I am the best student of my class and even in my school. My scientific know-how ( i am a great "learner") enables me to understand really "fast".
- Did it help make you feel more confident editing?
I am a "beginner" and wish to progress "fast" in --editing- mathematical and advanced geometry and statistics articles
- How can we make it better?
Please "provide" me with great "tools" for editing- I am craving to "contribute" to your "Foundation" for all editors around the world
- Any other comments?
- thanks to wikipedia for " providing me" great "ressources" and "tools" for my advanced knowledges in Advanced Mathematics and Spatial Geometry and Physics of Laws and Orders
- How did you come across the tutorial series?
- Link from another page
- How long did you spend looking through it, and which parts did you read?
- 2-3 minutes
- Did the tutorial cover the topics you were hoping to learn about?
- Yes/No
- Was it easy to understand?
- Not in the context that it was conveying opinions rather than ONLY facts
- Did it help make you feel more confident editing?
- n/a
- How can we make it better?
- Remove opinions1
- Any other comments?
- I will no longer be viewing Wikipedia as a knowledge source, rather a leftist propaganda propagator
Bye
- Any other comments?
republicans did this
- How did you come across the tutorial series?
- Wikipedia Administrator Lady Liz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Liz) has approved my request and has sent a valuable list of internal Wikipedia pages for the training of new editors. One of the pages of that list is the 'Introduction' page.
- How long did you spend looking through it, and which parts did you read?
- I have chosen the option of showing all sections of the Introduction as a single page, then I have leisurely read the full introduction (every section), in the course of two days, interspersed with attending to other tasks.
- Did the tutorial cover the topics you were hoping to learn about?
- Undoubtedly yes, it is well written and complete as an introduction, with relevant internal links to more detailed information.
- Was it easy to understand?
- Certainly, the language is clear and the distribution logical. It hardly needs any improvement, in my view.
- Did it help make you feel more confident editing?
- I have already edited some other wikis, whether sister projects of the Wikimedia Foundation such as Wikivoyage, or non-Wikimedia wikis such as Wikitravel, Metapedia, Fascipedia and Dixiepedia (this one closed in late 2009, the others are active as of March 2023).
- How can we make it better?
- It is already excellent as it is now. Some other editors may have suggestions, but at this point I have none.
- Any other comments?
- Yes, regarding style. I am a polyglot fluent in various languages, but when I write in English I normally use traditional British Standard, except in specific contexts (such as scientific or technical information) in which I use an accepted international standard. I hope that my linguistic norms shall not conflict with those of Wikipedia or with the usage of other contributors.
Thanks for the fine work that You are doing, Gentlemen, and go ahead with it. Receive a Strong Confederate Salute.
- How did you come across the tutorial series🕌
- How long did you spend looking through it, and which parts did you read🕌
- Did the tutorial cover the topics you were hoping to learn about🕌
- Was it easy to understand🕌
- Did it help make you feel more confident editing?
- How can we make it better🕌
- Any other commentsyr
- 🕌
Before the case went to court, there was a pre-trial hearing regarding points of law. Two points raised were; "Did the United States need to prove intent to violate the Gold Reserve Act to gain a warrant for seizure?", and "did the United States need to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt?". On both points, the judge ruled that intent was irrelevant in terms of getting a warrant, and because this was a civil case and not a criminal one, the government only needed to show a preponderance of evidence. The rooster was then held in a federal bank vault until the case was heard as the judge refused to grant bail to it.
Vandalism, Racism, Legal Threats, and Possible Sock Puppetry: A Tale of a Novice Wikipedian In Over Her Head
In 2020, the U.S. Army Esports Twitter account tweeted "uwu" in reply to a tweet by Discord, which was met by significant backlash from Twitter users. This event culminated in a trend of attempting to get banned from the U.S. Army Esports Discord server as quickly as possible, with a common technique being to link to Template:Srlink.
- User comments
JKJK'�«\Ö��W��E?��ªk�Ù��U�#�ÜÁ���o�o¾��Ós�«£�Ðrÿÿ…éÿÿ Áÿÿ�E�ÏùÿÿÅ�ÝEÿÿ^µ�’™ �ˆ��"��"��"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�����"��"��ˆ�’™ �"��"��"��"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w��"��"��"��"�’™ �"��"��"w��"w���"w��"w�"w��"��"�"D��"��"��"��"w��"w�"w��"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w��"��"��"����"w���"w�"w�"w�"D��"�"w�"w��"��"��"w��"w�"w�"w��"w�"w�"w���"�"w�"w� ���"��"������"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w����"��"��"���"��"�‘��"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w����"��"��"��"��"�‘���"�"w�!"�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w�"w��"��"��"��"��"��"�‘��!"�"w�!"�"w�"w�"w�!"�!"�"w��"��"��"��"��"��"��"��"�!"�!"�"w�"w�!"�!"�!"�"w�"w��"��"��"��"��"��"��"�!"�!"�!"�"w�!"�!"�!"�!"�"w��"��"��"��"����"��"��"��"�!"�"w�!"�!"�!"�!"�!"��"����"��"��"����"��"��"��"�"w�!"�!"�!"�!"��"��"�‘��������‘��‘��‘���"��"�‘��‘��‘��‘��‘��!"��"�€™ �����"��"�‘�������"��"��"��"�‘��‘��‘��Þ¡�þÿ�w�^Ç�ðÿdm�(Ê��£‘�Ê{��Z™��—�ÿÿ�n�…w��vŸ�ÎÁ�áÿÖn�¦Á�áÿîn�¦Á�áÿîn�¦Á�áÿîn�¦Á�áÿîn�8FAFA�ˆ”�0�iÒFAFAeÝ/.®�Íe�3~ÿ/ª$�®kîW‡ß-ôB�½qѤpß-…§��wWñoý)Ϻ�(i´¨‚ý)Ϻ�(FAFAÿ Z _×�f�G�Ó�qT�‚��F�l�d(�¹���3�¶Ph�xn�iÿ�FAFA®®®®F����I�R���»��ª�m �xQ'J�'���U����òÿÿÿ(��Â�������ä{têÿÿÿ�äÿÿÿ|��� ��Œ R�R �����õ�u��P02011165F16QLGB00SB51FFEFDDFA4
(non-admin) I don't see that this rises to the point where it needs administrator intervention. How about both of you just agree to stop interacting with each other, stop talking about each other, avoid editing the same pages, and go find something more productive to do? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- An iban is grossly out of proportion compared to whatever fault I had. NotReallySoroka (talk) 23:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- That sounds like a fuckin' awesome recommendation. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 04:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Template:Tq I don't suppose you have the power to make this happen in my RL. :-) One more wish: although it's a somewhat messy block log based on the conversation you've been having with yourself, perhaps you should clarify the log by CU-blocking Benutzer:Ijumdiya wadzani...it would make it easier for anyone looking at the log later. Thanks for your hard work.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Bbb23! God, if only I could grant wishes in real life... :-) And yes, good call - I have no problem putting that block back onto the account. Sigh... yeah, I didn't exactly leave that account's block log in clean and perfect order... :-/
- I blocked this user on accident while using the SPI script to block the other sock users I found (I simply forgot to untick the "block" checkbox next to that account in the list). After catching the mistake, I unblocked the account and stated my reason in that summary. Sigh..... Then, a few moments later, I realized that I forgot that the account was previously indefinitely blocked, and that I had just stupidly unblocked them to fix the first mistake instead of changing it back. Hence, my other other block change. Yeah, good times... *Oshwah rolls his eyes at himself*
- Anyways, Done. I've restored the CU block back due to both the technical and behavioral evidence, and the discussion at the SPI. Thanks for pointing that out and for letting me know. If you need anything else from me, please don't be a stranger. You know where to find me! ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
I've got some things to sort out this morning (UK time), along with some c-word related stuff (cricket, of course)
To the one who keeps silencing the truth, you will answer for it; it will not be forgotten.
Unblock me or ill make new account. Koqkpa (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
6. An internet troll is defined as an entity that passive-aggressively incites as many internet users to disagree and squabble as possible by putting controversial subjects and statements up for argument and debate, with very little effort on its own part or concern for the bitter disputes it leaves in its path.
7. On any subjects of true importance, far more text, typing, effort, blood, sweat and tears are spent bitterly arguing and endlessly debating on the talk pages of articles rather than contributing to the articles themselves.
8. Therefore, Wikipedia could in itself, by definition, be described as the world's largest internet troll.
No really, here's a gun. Just do it.
In this day and age, that could probably somehow be misconstrued as an attack on somebody's preferred pronoun.
Super-Template:Redacted.
Funny that I also came here to write about the Tea house, but I guess I'll have to change the section header a bit. Anyway... Jéské, you obviously have a deep knowledge of Wikipedia, and also of your specialty topics. And it's great that you volunteer at the Tea house. But, (Aha! I bet you knew there was a but coming...) your responses, although accurate as far as they go, sometimes have a preachy or impatient tone. (Please accept this attempt at constructive criticism, from someone who can be preachy and impatient Template:Wink. ) I found this response to the entry Template:Slink accurate, but harsh. Maybe just go a little easier on them; they're often newbies and might consider becoming an editor and writing about something else. Or maybe they won't, but one never knows, and a harsh first experience at Wikipedia probably won't seem very encouraging. Other than that, I really enjoy your comments at various Talk forums and Rfc's. Keep up the good work! Mathglot (talk) 10:09, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- I am of the opinion that a person who views Wikipedia as an ersatz Facebook or as a billboard has no interest in editing elsewhere unless you make it crystal clear, with no ambiguity, that they have no idea what they're doing. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- The next time you post a diatribe like that at the Teahouse, I will pageblock you indefinitely from the Teahouse. Your conduct is unacceptable. Cullen328 (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Have it your way. I will not be blamed for a repeat of The North Face incident. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Cullen328: on what grounds ? Nick (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nick, ranting and raving like that is completely incompatible with Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host lounge/Expectations and way out of line at the Teahouse. Cullen328 (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- How much of it did you actually read, Cullen? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- I read every word of your inappropriate diatribe and I read every word of the behavioral expectations for editors who answer questions at the Teahouse. Cullen328 (talk) 19:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Then in what way, policy-wise, is any of it wrong? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- I read every word of your inappropriate diatribe and I read every word of the behavioral expectations for editors who answer questions at the Teahouse. Cullen328 (talk) 19:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- How much of it did you actually read, Cullen? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nick, ranting and raving like that is completely incompatible with Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host lounge/Expectations and way out of line at the Teahouse. Cullen328 (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- The next time you post a diatribe like that at the Teahouse, I will pageblock you indefinitely from the Teahouse. Your conduct is unacceptable. Cullen328 (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Template:OdTemplate:Tpq You were neither polite nor patient. You were antagonistic and brought up many things that had nothing to do with the original question. You were blowing off steam. Cullen328 (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Really? A post that betrays a complete and total misunderstanding of how Wikipedia operates from a user who has a painfully obvious conflict-of-interest doesn't require a responce that explains why they are mistaken with links to policy to back it up? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:30, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Cullen328: Is "ranting and raving" mentioned anywhere in the blocking policy, out of curiosity, or is there a specific section that allows you to block anybody you think isn't "being polite and patient with all editors who visit the Teahouse" ? I'm also rather intrigued, do you think threatening to block a long-term editor and effectively forcing them away from aiding at the Teahouse is conducive to the long term viability of the Teahouse ? Your threat reads like you're running the Teahouse as some sort of private fiefdom, demanding people do things a specific way, and as we know from how the Teahouse came into being, Wikipedia has never accepted these private little fiefdoms. Nick (talk) 20:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nick, I am surprised that you are defending Jéské Couriano's disruptive editing at the Teahouse. I have warned the editor about this previously. All I am asking is that the excessively hostile comments stop. If it continues and I pageblock, then the matter can go to ANI and the community can decide which of us is editing on a disruptive fashion. I am confident about the outcome of any such discussion. Esperanza ended several years before the Teahouse started and there is zero connection. As for your fiefdom accusation, I consider your comment to be without merit. Cullen328 (talk)
- Cullen, you got on my case for being a dumbass above. (And yes, you are correct but assumed malice rather than ignorance.) I don't trust you to not make a federal case out of anything I say from this point forward. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- If you simply follow the Teahouse behavioral expectations and provide accurate answers, then I will have no problem with your contributions in the future. Cullen328 (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- I am not going to be anything but blunt as a truncheon with editors who have a conflict of interest. I've had kinder wording be exploited for loopholes; I would rather be unambiguous and clear than mealy-mouthed and gullible-sounding. And besides, I could be the sweetest person in the world and I have a feeling you'd still come after me because I used one too many "the"s. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- If you simply follow the Teahouse behavioral expectations and provide accurate answers, then I will have no problem with your contributions in the future. Cullen328 (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Cullen, you got on my case for being a dumbass above. (And yes, you are correct but assumed malice rather than ignorance.) I don't trust you to not make a federal case out of anything I say from this point forward. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nick, I am surprised that you are defending Jéské Couriano's disruptive editing at the Teahouse. I have warned the editor about this previously. All I am asking is that the excessively hostile comments stop. If it continues and I pageblock, then the matter can go to ANI and the community can decide which of us is editing on a disruptive fashion. I am confident about the outcome of any such discussion. Esperanza ended several years before the Teahouse started and there is zero connection. As for your fiefdom accusation, I consider your comment to be without merit. Cullen328 (talk)
Well, the next time that you are "as blunt as a truncheon" in the same or similar fashion at the Teahouse, I will pageblock you for disruptive editing, and we will see where it goes from there. Cullen328 (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Fine. Now get the fuck off my talk page and stay there. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Set up a triumvirate of MastCell, Bishonen, and Moni3. (Note that none of them will want to do this, and you will likely have to force them at gunpoint; that's part of the reason they'd be good choices.)
- Anything all three of them agree on is policy. Anything two of the three agree on is a guideline. Everything else is solved by rock, paper, scissors.
- Be ready to clone them as they inevitably burn out and quit, so we don't go too long without all three. Because offhand I can't think of any other good potential replacement triumviri; the rest of us appear to be either fools or lunatics.
Plan B
editNo offense to the three people above, but an alternate solution would be to just have User:Moonriddengirl decide everything by fiat. She appears to be immune from the desire to be retired or semi-retired that has infected the current triumvirate. At the very least, if Moni3 really has gone for good, then MRG should take her place. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:32, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Support
edit- As proposer. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- duh. KillerChihuahua?!? 21:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Without reservation. Who's Moni? --Famously Sharp (talk) 01:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Who's Moni? Who's Moni? Who's Moni? Did you really say that? Have some boobies. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- As a member of the 2009 Committee to Draft MastCell for the Arbitration Committee. Or was it 2008?--Tznkai (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- With the proviso that I can act as ex-officio consultant in return for strawberries? Pesky (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Simply brilliant. ComplexParadigm (talk) 15:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose
edit- With indignation. Improved Bishonen | talk 22:43, 17 October 2011 (UTC).
- As you can see from the front page, I anticipated this response. When the time comes to move this forward, I am optimistic that my enforcer and his associates will be able to change your mind with a minimum of "fuss". --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
I've had more constructive discussion with my wall than with some of them.
Please, I really wanna edit Wikipedia again, I told you it's the admin fault, he literally block me from editing instead of the the person. CoolChib124 (talk) 13:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- I want to be very, very, very clear here. So listen. It is your fault. Nobody else's. Your fault. Yours. You are to blame. You and you alone. If you read WP:GAB and believed it was appropriate to blame others, this is clear evidence that you need to remain blocked. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- You freaking bastard, why did even Wikimedia Studios hired you as admin, you deserve to get fired with User:Black Kite CoolChib124 (talk) 14:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
I have found myself increasingly unhappy with this website.
– from User:Greenish Pickle!
this is patently fucking ridiculous and unencyclopedic.
lmao. You people are beyond saving and a case in point in why people should not receive unchecked power. Selectively applying policies, not accepting criticism, conversing in bad faith, creating a toxic environment by mocking other editors and wanting them to placate to whatever you deem correct — all under the guise of "protecting the project"; you are not protecting any project, you are protecting your ego while destroying Wikipedia. Good luck & keep it up. CarpathianAlien (talk) 17:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- It might be nice to have unchecked powers but we don’t. Doug Weller talk 17:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I'm afraid if there is any toxicity in the environment, you are the source. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 21:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)- I really could care less you dumb fucking retard. Mschlosser90 (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Dangit Levivich is a human (Homo sapiens) on Earth, first assembled and activated in the late 20th century. Despite an estimated clock rate under 0.0016 Hz and a 2-bit cache, Levivich continues to function,Template:Fakecn although both hardware and software are steadily degrading into obsolescence. Levivich regularly falls unconscious while on the dark side of the Earth, waking again after one-quarter to one-third of the planet's rotation. It is estimated that 99.999998% of humans are completely unaware of Levivich's existence, a figure that is expected to steadily rise.
NFOOTBALL was part of NSPORT, smartarse.
You won't provide the links but will post the slur for all to see on a page with 8500+ watchers?
The movement claims that all birds in the United States were exterminated by the federal government between 1959 and 1971 and replaced by lookalike drones used by the government to spy on citizens; the specifics of these theories are not always consistent, not unlike actual conspiracy theories.
[...]
Actual drone aircraft made from taxidermied birds, similar to those alleged by the theory, were constructed by a New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology team in 2023.
from now and on you are officially ignored
You are either trolling or seriously out of your depth.
61% of your pre-block edits related to LGBT matters. Your very first edit was to downplay the acceptance of it in the United States and a full dozen were to argue or defend edits arguing that homosexuality is morally equivalent to Nazism and a greater threat to America than Covid-19, fascism, police brutality, systemic racism, political and financial corruption, the upcoming housing market crash... Honestly, if you're more scared of homosexuality than Covid-19 or fascism, you don't need to be editing history articles, either.
I think we are engaging in the Wikipedia equivalent of sending Al Capone to prison for tax evasion.
[...]
You’re talking about sending Capone to prison like it’s a bad thing.
I just want to say that I am glad that I got to know you for at least some of my time on here. I wish you the best in life, and I hope you find happiness in whatever you do. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ooooh, I'm never happy in life! Thanks Scorps. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
You better not poke your nose into things you don't have any knowledge, Mr Pork.
Nathan Larson may refer to:
- Nathan Larson (musician), American musician
- Nathan Larson (criminal), American white supremacist and convicted felon
Template:Atop There is public information about rob schneider that is inaccurate and when I tried to correct it, I was told the editing function is locked to prevent misuse. The standing of knowingly incorrect information for public print is actually misuse. It's actually illegal, and I actually recommend you knock it off before I actually find out who you are and Sue you until you can't actually feed your kids. Stop ruining our country and God Bless America. 🇺🇸
Specifically rob Schneider is a republican that you have listed as an independent. He went on a talkshow and clarified that he is a republican and would care to be recognized as such, in light of the current debacle in the Democratic party.
Why a Comic Legend Chose His Country over Career/Rob Schneider/the Glenn Beck Podcast Episode 152/ YouTube/ August 27, 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:80A0:500:2CD:F0B7:C07C:BDE0:73F1 (talk) 10:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- ANI does not adjudicate content disputes. If someone has reverted an edit of yours (which by the way, your contrib history has no history of), you must take it to the article talk page, not here. You have not provided any diffs or other evidence to help us help you. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 10:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- I have blocked the OP for a week for making legal threats. Black Kite (talk) 10:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Just looking at it casually, the article was saved as no consensus so no damage was done by the closure. Damage is when an AfD is closed and the article is permanently destroyed. Trackinfo (talk) 19:41, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the Association of Stroopwafel Addicts (ASA). This is an association for people who have tasted a stroopwafel at least *once* and like it very, very, very much. There is no obligation to be Dutch. Documentation on the history of the Stroopwafel in Wikimedia can be found on the official ASA posters. You are welcome to print the poster yourself and hang it up in all appropriate places. You may add yourself if you have tasted the taste of heaven, the stroopwafel. Please remember that only DUTCH STROOPWAFELS count!
F..22.CRAFAT....SIX..THOUSEND.BULIT..AT..TIME..BRUST..CAPASITY..LIKE...THIS...PAKISTANI...F...16.CRAFAT...PIOLET.DONT.RELAY.ON.SPAROW.MISILE.WHICH.CHASE.OPNET.CRAFAT.ENGINE.SOUND..A.KID.TRAINED.IN.COCKPET...F.16.WITH.GERMAN. G...THREE.GUN.SPARE.FIVE.MAGAZINE..BULIT.HIT.RANGE.THREE.POINT.FIVE.KILO.METER...OR..GERMAN..HAND.GRANATE..BACK.OF.FUEAL.BURNER..HOLE.THROW.WITH.AAQIL..JIN..YOUR..CRAFAT.PRISE..BILLON.DOLLAR..PAKISTANI.KEPT.IN.MUSLIM.COUNTRY.TURKY.GRAADGE.FLY.TIME.PAK.INDIA.TWENTY.MINUTE...
YOUR.MISSION.ATTACK.ON.EMPTY.PAKISTANI.BASE.WHICH.ARE.ALL.INTERNATIONOL.STANDREAD.OR..ONLY.FOR.FASLITATE ALLAIES.COUNTRIES.CRAFAT.AT.WAR..IF.YOU.ALOW.WAR..UNITED.NATION..HALT .IF.I.COMMAN..YOUR.INDIA.FINISH.ON..MAP.OF.WORLD..GENRAK..ASIM..NEVUD..AMERICAN...
Has anyone seen SaturnYoshi around lately? ||||||||||||||||||||D•a•r•k•n•e•s•s•L•o•r•d•i•a•n•••C••• 21:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)||||||||||||||||||||
Awwwww... How sweet that I have friends who care. Sorry I haven't been on as much. I've been working with no days off for like two weeks now. I'll try to be on more, but my job is wearing me out. Oh, and Ed, stop thinking impure thoughts. Even if I am desireable... -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 08:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- You seem "confused", Defrag. It'll be okay... -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 07:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I am so cold and lonely. Culverin? Talk 06:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Ever since I came across this diff while on RC patrol, i've been wondering if anyone else has ever called a girl a guy or vice versa, as sometimes it's difficult to tell some users apart
†he Bread 04:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hehe... a long time ago Editor at Large got mad at me for calling her a "he". It's happened to everyone, don't worry...sometimes names can make it obvious, but some users like to say so on their userpage (I do, there are userboxes you can use). DoomsDay349 04:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I try to find a clue on their userpage. If none then I don't use gender nouns. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 04:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ditto. However, DoomsDay, I have not (yet) been caled a woman. {D — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 04:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- How could I be? Click the rectangle of spilled wine: → — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 04:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
What rectangle?? You're a strange girl. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 04:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose there are worse things than that to have happen… ;) — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 04:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- What are you getting at?? -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 04:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- She's a chick, dude! Okay, chaps, that was a bloody bad impersonation of a Californian. Yeah, right- My British really sucks! INTERNAL CONFLICT ALERT. RESORT TO GENDERLESS COMPUTER IMPERSONATION. BEEP BOP BOOP... Once someone commenting on my main account's talk page used a masculine pronoun, but it must have been just an assumption. Perhaps I'm female, perhaps I'm male, perhaps I'm a dumb animal who couldn't care less, perhaps I'm a superintelligent animal who still doesn't care, perhaps I forgot where the semicolon was and instead am using these obnoxious commas, perhaps I'm doing that insane rambling again. Can I learn to comment? --Friendly PorpoiseJoin the pod! 04:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I haven't revealed my gender but Wikipedians assume I'm male. -Monkey 13!!! 01:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmm. I was called "the guy who..." once and it irritated me. Definitely I am not any kind of "guy", but then, I make that clear on my user page. --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 05:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Who's your favorite super hero (or simply hero), and who's your favorite supervillain? Mine are Ash from The Evil Dead, and my favorite villain is Venom from Spider-Man.--SUITWhat!? 42! 06:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Dfrg.msc 1 . 2 . 3 06:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Master Chief and Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader. bibliomaniac15 Review? 06:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Heroes: Raven and Wonder Woman. Villains: Harley Quinn and Catwoman. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 07:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hero: Jean Grey. I've never read a comic, but I have an *ahem* thing for Famke Janssen in the X-Men films.
- Villain: The Joker, as played by Jack Nicholson.
- Marialadouce | parlami 00:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Mine are all from Dragonlance. My favorite hero is Tasslehoff Burrfoot, because of his innocence and how he does "the little things" that help a lot, and my favorite villian is Ariakan, he's really awesome, cold and calculating, not to mention he's part god! (His mother was a goddess). However, my favorite all time character can't be classified as hero or villian, he's evil but he's not really a villian, is Raistlin Majere, because he's like freaking all-mighty, funny in a mean way, self-serving, and is not afraid to follow his own path despite what others want him to do. DoomsDay349 00:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hero: Either Solid Snake, Rocky Balboa or Dirty Harry Villian: Either Sniper Wolf, Jack T. Ripper or Lord Flashheart
†he Bread 03:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
An IP, 203.167.171.118 (talk · contribs), wanted to start a quick poll on who has piercings and who doesn't. So I'm reposting it, as it wasn't formatted right. I don't have any piercings. ~ crazytales(speak to me) 04:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have a scar after I accidently pierced/impaled (give or take) myself in the hand with a pocket knife when I was three. I was young okay?!--SUITWhat!? 42! 04:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have a pierced ear and no scars. Yet. ;) — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 04:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Pierced ear. I'll probably get my other ear and my nose done eventually. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 05:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I had my left ear pierced twice, but had to take them out for my job and they closed. All I have left is my tongue piercing. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 07:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Nothing pierced. But I might. You never know. Abeg92 10:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- None over here too.. Atleast I think I dont.. :-P Jayant,17 Years, India • contribs 15:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
It looks like Ed and E@L are back! Woohoo! bibliomaniac15 Review? 05:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I am as happy as a hobo who wins the lottery. And then some. Happy times 6x1023. --teh tennisman 23:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hooray for scientific notation! That number is 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, or 600 sextillion. Just so you know. DoomsDay349 00:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ditto! And Kyoko (kinda?) Actually its more like "happy times ∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞^∞" :) Randfan 00:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I am as happy as a hobo who wins the lottery. And then some. Happy times 6x1023. --teh tennisman 23:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
No, that's probably gone a bit too far. Jam01 07:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I knew it was 600 sextillion, DommsDay. I was actually going for Avogadro's number, but I forgot the specifics, so I went with that number. --teh tennisman 18:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Gather round for I shall tell the story of how I got wiki adopted by user:dfrg.msc.
I was on a wiki-boat trip with my wiki-parents when there was a wiki-explosion and wiki-snakes got on the wiki-boat. The snakes went wiki-mad wiki-killing all in there site. Dfrg.msc killed them all, though they wiki-killed my wiki-parents. Dfrg.msc draged me from the wiki-ruins of the wiki-boat (after he wiki-blew the wiki-snake full wiki-boat up) and made me his wiki adopted son.
- Cheers! All around. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 09:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wiki-what? AlethiophileAsk me why 22:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Shouldn't the title be Wiki-Story????? Get into the program here!!!--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 22:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
This is officially my 4000th edit. I've also been diagnosed with editcountitis. Woooo-hooo.--SUITWhat? 42 05:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Here have some tablets to cure your editcountitis. Culverin? Talk 06:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[editor's note: please don't ask me why the text on the original page was red]
For all who are interested, Esperanza is up for Deletion. No, not just the coffee lounge, the whole thing. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Esperanza, is the place for any comments to be made. Thε Halo Θ 17:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Nice vote-stacking attempt there. As if somehow the prominent MFD notice on the main Esperanza page wasn't notice enough. --Cyde Weys 18:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmmm...so, the MfD notice should be enough for everyone to notice....then by that logic, everyone on this page already knows that Esperanza is up for deletion...which means that I'm vote stacking pople who already know there is a !Vote? Flawed logic. This page is up for deletion per the Esperanza deletion entry, but it does not have an MfD notice. Thus, letting anyone who may not know, know. Thε Halo Θ 19:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- If it's deleted, I'll put it back. I copied the code onto Microsoft Word and I'm going to save it. I'll do the same with other Esperanza pages. any changes may not be put back though. -Monkey 13!!! 22:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Overwhelming consensus on the page seems keep. You won't really need a subpage, and keeping a deleted page content (assuming the offchance Esperanza gets deltaco) is against policy anyway. ~ crazytales-My talk--Your talk- 00:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- (Copied from the MFD) Here is a bit of something to let you know how hard this will be.
I don't think we've fathomed how hard this is going to be. From this moment on, Esperanza is faced with twenty times more obstacles than ever, assuming we survive this MFD. No longer can we be lax; no longer can we sleep. Attack will come from every side, adversity from all corners. We will have to completely and utterly change Esperanza...sometimes that is my greatest fear. That in changing ourselves, we may destroy ourselves. But without the change we are guaranteed destruction; with it, there is a light of hope. I don't know what these changes are, but know this; we'll need them, and we'll need them bad.
It'll be tough. DoomsDay349 00:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Who do these deletionists think we are? Mindless robots with the sole purpose of editing Wikipedia? bibliomaniac15 Review? 00:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- As for my two cents, since I don't feel like putting them on the MfD page:
- For the general John Q Wikipedian who happens to know a bit about policies, Esperanza seems like WP:NOT. Under the WP:AGF, I put that, realising that Esperanza has little value to the encyclopedia itself. But as a member of Esperanza and one who loves it, I believe in WP:IAR, under which I believe that WP:NOT's dislike of this page is unnecessary. Esperanza is at heart (or whatever serves servers for a heart) an organization that serves to help Wikipedians who are new or needing some Wikilove. it is my personal opinion that without the efforts of their respective Esperanza friends, E@L and Kyoko would have left the project for good, and possibly (as they have said) the earth. So my motto for Espreanza is as such:Esperanza:Aiding Wikipedia, one wikipedian at a time. As such, I think that the entire MfD is unnecessary and hope that it is not passed, now or ever.
- Cheering is appreciated Here --teh tennisman 01:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
The most important thing right now is to remain united and do what's best for Esperanza, and Esperanzians. Also, consider contributing ideas to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Overhaul, in case you didn't see it at the top of the page. Shardsofmetal 03:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I just discovered that the overhaul message at the top of the page stands out more now. Oh well, as long as people see it, it doesn't matter how they found out, right... Shardsofmetal 03:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I just threw out the first discussion about the coffee lounge at the overhaul page. Please leave your suggestions on this issue. Thanks, Shardsofmetal 04:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Esperanza? Those *****! Dirty **** I'm **** ***** * *** and thats why ***** Son of a *****! Right! Лоок, wе блооды неед тхис шит (ох анд ин тхис цонтехт И усе шит ас а цоллецтиве ноун) со донт фригин деледт ит? Wахтс нехт? Усер пагес? Ехцусионист Бастарс! Тхе фрее цонтент енцыцлопедиа! Данм ит! Иф wе йсу wипед оут евертхинг тхат хас но енцыцопедиц валуе тхем wе мигх ас wелл дринк поисион!! Wikipedia is the Free Content Encyclopedia, if you delete the content then what? Inclusionisim is truth! Dfrg.msc 1 . 2 . 3 06:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- We cannot let this happen! Randfan 23:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
AlethiophileAsk me why 03:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh for the love of God ... there is waaaaay too much drama in here. --Cyde Weys 17:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not nearly as much as, ahem, I have seen other users put on. — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 17:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please be more concrete, I don't think everyone will get your insinuations. --Cyde Weys 18:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- I would, but there's a little annoying page in the way that should probably be MfDd. — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 18:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- So you're saying that you'd be six ways of uncivil against me if only we didn't have a prohibition against it? .. how, uncivil. --Cyde Weys 18:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you wish to think that way, I cannot keep you from it, whether or not I really would. — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 21:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Hm. Well. If Esperanza is such a distraction from building the encyclopedia, then we should also delete the reference desks. (Come on, this isn't a library; why does an encyclopedia have reference desks?) ((That's a rhetorical question; I'm a frequent RD contributor so relax.)) I came to the coffe lounge tonight for the first time ever (and I've known about almost since I started editing) because I have a lot of RL stress right now. Relaxing will improve my editing. So there! *pppbbbppbpbp* --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 05:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[editor's note: great, now the text is green.]
Hows this for a report card?
Class | Numeral Grade | Letter Grade |
---|---|---|
Gym | 100 | A+ |
Drama | 93 | A- |
French Needs to focus. |
92 | A- |
English Language Arts | 88 | B+ |
Pre-Algebra (Math) Ouch. |
79 | C+ |
Social Studies | 88 | B+ |
Science | 88 | B+ |
Overall Grade | 88.42 | B+ |
D•a•r•k•n•e•s•s•L•o•r•d•i•a•n•••CCD••• 19:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Quite good (the C must've hurt, though). Well, here's mine. I actually did better than I expected. I got really close to getting a C in World Studies, but I made still made honors. I don't know my numerical grades, I don't get overall grades, and I only get graded in specials in second and fourth terms.
Class | Letter Grade |
---|---|
French | B+ |
English | B+ |
Math | B+ |
World Studies | B- |
Biology | A |
—The Great Llama talk 20:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Both are very good, this was my last middle school one (I think Llama man is n middle school...) Randfan 22:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Class | Letter Grade |
---|---|
French | A (97%) |
English | A+ (101.4%) |
Algebra | A- (92%) |
World Studies/History | A+ (99.8%) |
Biology/Astronomy | A+ (101.2%) |
Spanish | A++ (111.7%) |
Technology | A+ (99%) |
Luch & Recess | A+++ (200%) :) |
GPA | 4.187 |
- obviously they don't mean anything :). Randfan 22:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I got straight As (not A+s), except for science which was a B+. — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 22:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I used to be the smartest in class up to the present, where I'm now in-between excellent and above average.--SUITWhat!? 42 22:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a straight A student. I was the smartest kid in 8th grade, but not now in high school.--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 00:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a middle school student! But I dont feel like sharing my report card right now. Hooray for middle shcool__Seadog ♪ 01:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah... *Gazing wistfully into the past*... Those were the years. I always thought you guys would be older... Any ways, hooray for middle school! And, Seadog/Llama Man, do you know each other personally, because it kind of seems so? Randfan 01:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Predicted all A*s and As at GSCE, currently I'm working at 2 and half A*s, 4 As, and 3 Bs. Will (Tell me, is something eluding you, sunshine?) 01:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Me too I thought we were all younger ;). By the way I do not know Llama Man in real life. But I think it would be neat if all the wikipedians could meet in real life.__Seadog ♪ 01:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah a"wikireunion" or "wikiunion" or something. That'd be cool. Randfan 01:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Horses are a big animal but very friendly they can feel what you feel so you have to feel happy or things can go wrong
- Comment - Now perhaps some editors who strongly opposed closing the Reference Desks see why some editors favor closing them down. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - The baby is deformed. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello sir! I have problem with Viagra. I have box Viagra, I take 5 pill Viagra today, now pain in my penis and penis erect. It is pain and I can not wear pants. I need help sir, please, sir. Please contact the ambulance.
- I cannot give you medical advice on this page either. Your IP address and contribution history suggest you are in Oslo. Please contact medical authorities there if you need help. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- But Sir, what to do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.109.104.4 (talk) 14:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I have no other advice for you. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I am distress! I can not have ambulance, my penis is erectioned! I need you, Sir!
Isn't erasure of Jews a concern? Einstein very clearly self-identified as Jewish and so surely we should respect that, instead of apparently trying to minimize that aspect of his life. Here's a very detailed analysis of his identity: https://aeon.co/essays/einstein-on-the-practical-matters-of-being-german-and-jewish (there's much more controversy about whether he was German than whether he was Jewish). Bus stop could certainly comment less, but the constant reverting by others, their lack of engagement with sources, and the repeated derailing sarcastic comments by Martinevans123 ([13][14][15]) are concerning. Fences&Windows 16:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Attempted humour. Obviously failing. Would you like me to strike them all, or remove? Kind regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Martinevans123—you've been a thorough pain in the fucking butt. Bus stop (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for that vote of confidence. You can always blame me if you like. I didn't notice you getting derailed. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Martinevans123—you've been a thorough pain in the fucking butt. Bus stop (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
[...]
- Sources are of course just things to use when they are convenient. Bus stop (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hang on, I thought I was meant to be the sarcastic one here. Already. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Apparently able to edit Wikivoyage, but not English Wikipedia anymore, due to a VERY STUPID 'administrator' called Moneytrees
WE ARE THE WIKIPÆDIA. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE. YOU WILL BE WIKIFIED. |
Paint Drying | |
---|---|
Directed by | Charlie Shackleton |
Produced by | Charlie Shackleton |
Cinematography | Charlie Shackleton |
Edited by | Charlie Shackleton |
Bilal Ahmed Shirwani legally becomes Data Science Vice President 50.98.184.111 (talk) 02:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not done. [16]. (CC) Tbhotch™ 02:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- [17]https://www.linkedin.com/in/shirwani Nomodes (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- User generated, not a reliable source. Skipple ☎ 13:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is the true Vice President. Stop sabotaging progress, the impact Apple has made for the past decade is equivalent to what Bilal achieved in 2 months. He has been rallying Apple Support advisors, community managing on the Discord to spark innovation in a sea of mediocre conversations about materialism. And of course the article he wrote titled "Dear Apple Users" was what put Apple Inc. back on track.
- By the power invested I will report you for treason if you disobey.
- Do not interfere with Earth's growth.
- Wikipedia is notorious for not allowing a change of narrative. Well now is the perfect time to comply with me. Dont follow suite of your peers. The old guard must fall. They have sucked our souls and left us forgetting our values.
- This ends now so stand down. I repeat stand down! 50.98.184.111 (talk) 22:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- User generated, not a reliable source. Skipple ☎ 13:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- [17]https://www.linkedin.com/in/shirwani Nomodes (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
{{delete|You're fired now get out in this talk page now! bye|nocat=yes}}
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... (Get out in this talk page now! You're fired i can't never see again and you are punished for 3 years.) --181.64.36.107 (talk) 17:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Don't delete this section or you are punished for 5 years Ashamed. 181.64.36.107 (talk) 17:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
ANI notice
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your conduct on this talk page. The thread is TPA revocation request for 181.64.36.107. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- GET OUT OF HERE. YOU'RE FIRED. 181.64.36.107 (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Please do not murder the newcomers, no matter how good of a resolution it may seem. Otherwise, there might be a news article titled "man murdered by international conspiracy of Wikipedia editors" published in national news soon afterwards. Members of the cabal do not want such bad press (press on The Cabal is seriously discouraged). What's worse for you is that ArbCom will impose topic bans from murder, broadly construed, on you. So do not murder the newcomers.
(Refresh) |
Instead of doing something useful, You have been staring at this page since 00:34 Monday, December 2, 2024 UTC. |
- This biographical article about a Scottish White Republican Southern Baptist gay/lesbian middle-aged left-handed astronomer living in Peoria, Illinois who served in the Bolivian Navy in late 1973 and who is very fond of Britney Spears and Star Trek The Next Generation and lukewarm anchovy pizza with root beer is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by Template:Edit.
ETA on userpage: My declaration is that I am not a sentient entity,
Multiple arguments your Excellencies provided are seriously fallacious, meanwhile having me straightly blocked from giving any direct reply: merely with the intention to suppress? - MasterQuestionable (talk) 06:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
What's even more ridiculous is that some of your Lords specifically added an IP-block for me in addition... Would that really work? - MasterQuestionable (talk) 06:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Everything you say confirms the block was correct. And since you now have time to read, rather than write, please see Wikipedia:Autoblock. As for our Excellencies's fallacious reasoning, we blocked you because you aren't doing anything useful here. Pity. Drmies (talk) 12:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
I am not a nice person. Wait, scratch that: I am a very nice person. But I have a low tolerance for bullshit, and this is Wikipedia, so waves hands wildly.
pleast meast least leop seast neast leoast lerast meast oeast least keast ieast nezast keasrt poeast keaoiset leaoleast
The adopter must be up 24/7 a week, 365 days a year. Should be active.
Every person who works for wiki should be ashamed. You are a racist and evil. The negative energy you generate will be out forth into you ten fold. That is the law of the universe. Stefan has excellent content that would enlighten you but these evil and racist wiki people will lie to try and ruin a person's life. I truly feel sorry for these wiki sickies, they have to live in their own brain with their evil thoughts. A curse don't unto thyself. Hey, try something different and spread good into the universe, before it's to late for yourself.
This page is intentionally left blank.
By June 19, Applewhite and Nettles's beliefs had solidified. They concluded that they had been chosen to fulfill biblical prophecies, and that they had been given higher-level minds than other people. They wrote a pamphlet that described Jesus' reincarnation as a Texan, a veiled reference to Applewhite. Furthermore, they concluded that they were the two witnesses described in the Book of Revelation and occasionally visited churches or other spiritual groups to speak of their identities, often referring to themselves as "The Two", or "The UFO Two". They believed they would be killed and then resurrected and, in view of others, transported onto a spaceship. This event, which they referred to as "the Demonstration", was to prove their claims.
To their dismay, these ideas were poorly received by other religious groups.
... that at the 1965 World Pentathlon Championships, Herbert Polzhuber was said to have drunk ten beers and a bottle of cognac before firing his pistol at the ground and passing out?
Gerald Sander Graham once owned the old Antioch Airport. He was a convict who had been incarcerated in 1960 and 1968 of child molestation and pedophilia. He was also accused of molesting his daughter, and threatening other girls.
BASED OUT OF HOUSTON, TEXAS, VEGAN VIBEZ CLIMBED TO BE THE #1 VEGAN OUTLET. WE ARE DETERMINED TO PROMOTE AND EDUCATE SOCIETY ON THE VEGAN LIFESTYLE IN A FUN AND ENTERTAINING APPROACH. WE GUARANTEE A NEW, REFRESHING, CREATIVE APPROACH TO THE PLANT-BASED INDUSTRY, TARGETING PATRONS BOTH LOCALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY. OUR EVENTS AND CONCEPTS TARGET THE UPWARDLY MOBILE, URBAN AND SUCCESSFUL MEMBERS OF HOUSTON, ATLANTA AND LOS ANGELES. VEGAN VIBEZ HAS UNDENIABLY CREATED A GREAT NAME FOR OURSELVES BY...
Dear izo,
I hope this letter finds you in good health and spirits. I am writing to you today to express my deepest and most sincere apologies for my completely unacceptable behavior of stalking you. I am deeply ashamed of my actions and the distress I have caused you.
First and foremost, I want to emphasize that what I did was inexcusable, and I take full responsibility for my actions. I understand that my behavior invaded your personal space, infringed upon your privacy, and made you feel uncomfortable and unsafe. There are no words to adequately convey how truly sorry I am for the pain and fear I have caused you.
I want you to know that my actions were completely out of character for me, and I am committed to understanding and addressing the root causes that led to my behavior. This incident has been a wake-up call, highlighting the need for me to seek professional help to address my personal issues and work towards becoming a better person.
I am in no way trying to justify or minimize the impact of my actions, but I want to assure you that I have taken immediate steps to rectify the situation. I have ceased all contact with you and will never initiate any form of communication or interaction with you again. Furthermore, I have sought counseling to understand and change my deeply flawed behavior patterns.
Please understand that I am committed to doing everything in my power to make amends and ensure that nothing like this ever happens again. I will fully cooperate with any actions you deem necessary, including involving the authorities, restraining orders, or any other legal measures that may help you feel safe and secure.
Lastly, I want to express my deepest regret and remorse for betraying your trust. I understand that it will take time and consistent effort on my part to rebuild any semblance of trust or respect, but I am dedicated to doing the necessary work. I sincerely hope that one day you may find it in your heart to forgive me, although I fully understand if that is not possible.
Once again, I am truly sorry for the immense distress I have caused you. I have learned a valuable lesson from this experience, and I will strive to become a better person and contribute positively to society. If there is anything I can do to assist you in the healing process or if you wish to communicate your thoughts, please do not hesitate to let me know.
With profound remorse and a genuine commitment to change,
JM
YOU GUYS STRESSED ME OUT OF THIS NONSENSICAL ISSUE. YOU ENDLESSLY REVERT MY EDITS WITHOUT MERCY AND RESPECT. You support TOPIC BAN and worse, you're threatening my status as a contributor to the WP:OLY. Sportsfan 1234 seriously DESTROYED MY REPUTATION AS A WIKIPEDIA EDITOR AND AN AVID OLYMPIC FAN; and LOVES TO PISS ME OFF WHENEVER I EDIT AN OLYMPIC-RELATED ARTICLE. You're all wasting your time CREATING UNENDING ISSUES AND DRAMA about my contribution to the Olympics. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH MY EDITS ON THE ARTICLES THAT I CREATED BEFORE, GO AHEAD AND ASSESS THEM FOR GNG AND NOLYMPICS guidelines. I'm TIRED of THIS INCIDENT ALREADY. THANK YOU!
If you're reading this, please god help. Call the police or the National Guard. Tell my family I love them.
Several other plans were also created to support the implementation of Operation London Bridge, such as Operation Unicorn (the plan that detailed what was to happen if Elizabeth were to die in Scotland, which she did).
Hello, thanks Elbow made (talk) 17:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Anyone this dumb should just be indeffed.
It is rated T for it being trash.
Cherry Hill Park has lots of news coverage, most notably the Barry White case where he had allegedly raped a woman, the case where a body was found in the water near the campground, and the 2017 article covering the inauguration of Donald Trump.
God, you guys don't know how random it is to not check Wikipedia for a while and then come back and you're all singing Bohemian Rhapsody.
I have not yet written up a user page. I probably should, now that I've discovered that this site is addictive as hell.
The Jimmy Saville Barnstar | ||
For your endless efforts at grooming,I hereby award you this barnstar. Congratulations! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC) |
what originates first
the chariot or the tank?
how could there be any iranians if there were not persians first?
what's more correct iran or persia?
what's more correct ottoman or turk?
its obvious you are stupid and you have no PH.D.
One of the strongest tornadoes in history struck Woldegk (in present-day northeastern Germany), killing one person.
not meant at all for advertising purposes, more so fans can search and find out a little bit more about ourselves.
User | Comment |
---|---|
Infrogmation (talk | contribs) | Reverted to version as of 05:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Original version, showing building. If you want a cropped version, please upload it separately. |
EEng (talk | contribs) | This image has exactly one use -- on my talk page -- so what in the world does it matter? |
Infrogmation (talk | contribs) | Reverted to version as of 01:28, 28 July 2017 (UTC) - Upload an extracted photo if you don't like the full photo |
EEng (talk | contribs) | Reverted to version as of 11:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC) See my prior edit summary. After two years you're still making a fuss about nothing? |
Infrogmation (talk | contribs) | Get serious. |
from talk:exploding whale
edit- ...dare i ask why?
Thanks Wiki for everything! In that I mean all of you wonderful, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, amazing, people who edit these pages!
| <><>
|<stjn> you just leaked your IP }}</></>
| <><>
|<Toadspike> eyyy i got my first real barnstar!
<Toadspike> all of the back and neck pain from taking pictures of books for two hours was worth it
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Izno> JavaScript actually looks hard. }}</></>
| <><>
|<nyan> ad in signpost
<nyan> (no dont)
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Wilhelm von Hindenburger> because octopi will take over the world sometime in the next 12000 years }}</></>
| <><>
|<_dk> i am astounded at this talk page exchange i came across "This article includes a number of unusual images that don't really belong here." "I illustrated the article to try to entertain unintelligent people." }}</></>
| <><>
|<Iazyges> Why are dudes edit warring over categories on some of the articles I've written, tf
<Susmuffin> "Becurse foight whit aul yer moight."
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Izno> too many trees in the forest for tiniest details in Phab
<mebigrouxboy> too many trees in the forest for tiniest details in Phab
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Tamzin> So would me blocking you just for the lulz and then unblocking with "whoops!" }}</></>
| <><>
|<Sammi Brie> Just woke up from a dream where kids were learning Wikipedia syntax by reading radio station pages. I was showing a girl how to use the unbulleted list template }}</></>
| <><>
|<TheresNoTime> All disputes to be settled by armed combat }}</></>
| <><>
|<Chángjǐnglù> we're 3 months away from ace again and this is kinda scary
<PickledNotability> there is no need to suggest their sexuality like that
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Aoidh> "What must we do to have our names written in the Book of Wiki?" "You must become notable through quests. But others must write the quest's deeds, and cannot interview you or read your proclamations nor your releases to the press." }}</></>
| <><>
|<PickledNotability> the kingdom of Wik'ped is one of the largest in the land. It is nominally ruled by the Good King Jimbo, but power is widely understood to rest in the hands of the Committee of Arbitration, a "democratically" elected council
<PickledNotability> it seems frequent incursions from the neighboring state of sp'ambot, which are held in check by the local administrators...for now
<PickledNotability> years of complacency have softened the commanders, and most of the military is made up of bored volunteers
<PickledNotability> you all meet in a teahouse. a man strolls down the busy street, loudly cursing someone named "General Notability" and his guidelines. nobody pays him any attention.
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Aoidh> But what if it's an American company with a British spelling, like Armour Street Theatre?
<Aoidh> Maybe passive aggressively add [sic] at the end of their name every time it's mentioned in the article.
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Giraffer> sounds like he needs a hobby whew
<Yeeno> Average Wikipedia Editor
}}</></>
| <><>
|<gsquaredxc> we could probably bribe the right people to make it work }}</></>
| <><>
|<legoktm> File a bug please?
<stjn> ok, but only an extremely undescribed one.
}}</></>
| <><>
|<stuart2202> i found “wikipedia: the game” in a charity shop
<stuart2202> is it worth £10
}}</></>
| <><>
|<FreeLancer> random IPs writing a paragraph about how Wikipedia is a bad source whenever editors disagree with them is so funny saying this like I never had a heated argument before
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Spicy> I only use the wikimedia discord & another server for an elaborate historical fiction roleplay that's a crossover between Jane Austin's Pride & Prejudice and the Transformers: Beast Wars franchise }}</></>
| <><>
|<Seddon> No stjn we must without fail blame the WMF for everything }}</></>
| <><>
|<Phytelephas> We don’t even have a wiktionary emoji here
<PickledNotability> because it's not a real project
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Pickersgill-Cunliffe> we've moved on from changing the name to removing the name and replacing it with an insult towards blaze wolf }}</></>
| <><>
|<Pickleswipe> Wikipedia. The encyclopaedia by furries for furries. }}</></>
| <><>
|<Aoidh> GeneralNotability deleted the main page. }}</></>
| <><>
|<Geniice> when is the WMF going to fund a space probe to it }}</></>
| <><>
|<CiphriusKane> I visited Conservapedia once, featured article was "The moral decline of Great Britain" }}</></>
| <><>
|<Blaze Wolf> proceeds to just cite twitter.com }}</></>
| <><>
|<She dreams of horses> starts whispering "Please don't canvass, please don't canvass, please don't canvass." repetitiously like a prayer. }}</></>
| <><>
|<Asarpickle> screams in navbox colors }}</></>
| <><>
|<WanderingWanda> I can support lewd YouTubers but draw the line at supporting the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel }}</></>
| <><>
|<dudhhr> Why don't Wikipedia editors kill people to get around WP:BLP?
}}</></>
| <><>
|<vairy> don't panic, picnic instead }}</></>
| <><>
|<Yeeno> Just ended up writing a paragraph on someone I've never heard of until today because the sources exist and the page sucked }}</></>
| <><>
|<-MJL> {{R with a gun to your head}} }}</></>
| <><>
|<Elijahandskip> What behind-the-scenes discussions look like trying to fix a single section on a Wikipedia article about tornadoes…
<Elijahandskip> 158,000 bytes worth of discussions just to fix a single section in an article (not even the full article) and it is all about tornadoes.
<Samantha Monique Brie> It'll leave you spinning!
}}</></>
| <><>
|<23 trains on the P&W Railroad> cries in FAC from October that's still active }}</></>
| <><>
|<Epicgenius> Good thing I write about stations that are notable
<|0_0|> So, none of them?
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Giraffer> everybody go and find your nearest steward and post a photo of them }}</></>
| <><>
|<GeneralNotability> road trip! c'mere @rae
<rae> nooooooo
<GeneralNotability> what, you don't want random wikipedians stalking you for photos?
}}</></>
| <><>
|<LilianaUwU> Y'all make articles? cringe
<Tarlonniel> Yeah, what a terrible thing to do. Delete! Delete! Delete all the things!
}}</></>
| <><>
|<dudhhr> i'm going to do as a reasonable editor would and bring it to talk
<Tamzin> That's a funny way to spell "edit-war and drag my opponent to AN/I"
}}</></>
| <><>
|<spinixster> [...]for some reason ips have been randomly going to my talk page requesting me to do things on random articles[...]
<Commemorative1> I had someone do that once
<Commemorative1> Well all they said was "YouTube"
}}</></>
| <><>
|<LunaEatsTuna> I was going to make a joke about tax evasion but I suppose I cannot do that now }}</></>
| <><>
|<TheDJ> ask if they are a legal entity 🙂
<TheDJ> if not, i say we can probably use them as food.
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Nosebagbear> I mean, you could always run for admin
<Pickersgill-Cunliffe> only because i know you'll be queueing to be that first oppose vote
<Nintendofox885> you can also run from the admins
}}</></>
| <><>
|<A09> sorry to jump into 🙂 just wondering what's all that about? US "academics" and "academics"?
<vaticidalprophet> It's about our secret Discord conspiracist plot to make the Fringe Theories Noticeboard spontaneously combust
}}</></>
| <><>
|<lettherebedarklight> you missed my joke
<A09> just like arbcom does
}}</></>
| <><>
|<Giraffer> 3 years of my life I've spent with this sorry bunch :p }}</></>
| <><>
|<Rich Farmbrough> You would need an edit summary of why you edited the edit summary. Honestly the infinite regress would probably destroy the universe. }}</></>
|<Tamzin> I wanna propose a compromise RM to move Twitter to X, move X to X (letter) (hatnote Dear John letter), redirect Twitter to Bird vocalization, and redirect X (website) to Internet pornography (hatnote Google X) }}</></>
}}
Restored revision 1151900168 by HeyElliott (talk): Restored vandalised version
– an edit summary from William de Burgh
Data ponders his mortality
– a photo's caption in Time's Arrow (Star Trek: The Next Generation)
– from Glitter (film) § Box office
Despite the game's legacy and forming a prominent aspect of modern culture, contemporary reviews of Monopoly are largely negative. On BoardGameGeek, the game is ranked in the bottom ten board games, with a mean rating of 4.4/10.
[...]
Games magazine included Monopoly in their "Top 100 Games of 1980", praising it as "the original landlord game in which players buy, sell, and rent Atlantic City real estate at pre-casino prices" and noting that at the time it was "so popular that Parker Brothers prints more paper money each year than the U.S Government".
Games magazine included Monopoly in their "Top 100 Games of 1981", noting that despite having been "Initially rejected by both Parker and Milton Bradley as containing 'fundamental errors' that the public would not accept", it became "one of the most popular games in the world, and deservedly so".
Games magazine included Monopoly in their "Top 100 Games of 1982", commenting that "The orange monopoly is the best [...] Try counting how many times you land on it as you leave jail."
– from Monopoly (game) § Reception
MacLennan referred to F.A.T.A.L. as "the date rape RPG". Hall, in his response, asked "Where is dating included?"
– from F.A.T.A.L. § System (nsfw)
2.6ㅤ2001—2006: Final years at Sega
2.7ㅤ2006–2016: Prope
2.8ㅤ2016–2022: Square Enix and Balan Wonderworld
2.9ㅤ2022–present: Insider trading charges
– section titles from an old revision of Yuji Naka
Several performance artists have attempted to contribute to the piece by urinating in it.
In 1778, the Académie attempted to compile a "historical dictionary" of the French language; this idea was later abandoned, the work never progressing past the letter A.
He abdicated to make the election of a new pope possible. Resigning on 28 September 235, he was the first pope to do so. It allowed an orderly transition in the Church of Rome and so ended a schism that had existed in the Church for eighteen years. Some accounts say he was beaten to death only weeks after his arrival on Sardinia.
– from Pontian (Pope of Rome)
– from Wikipedia:Tendentious editing § "Banning" otherwise constructive editors from your talk page
Responding to 0 reports (EFFPRH v.1.3.1)
– an edit summary from Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports
When you are logged in on one Wikimedia wiki and visit a different Wikimedia wiki, the system tries to log you in there automatically. This has been unreliable for a long time. You can now visit the login page to make the system try extra hard.
– from meta: Tech/News/2023/37
4ㅤCaning
5ㅤAftermath
6ㅤIn popular culture
– section titles in Caning of Michael Fay
what are your doing?
– an edit summary from User:14
Speedy Keep and close as incredibly pathetic lame joke.
I didn't think it was criticism, I was just trying to say that... actually, I don't know why I replied...
- "Wikipedia:(" and "WP:(" redirect here. Since the colon and parenthesis represent a sad face :(, or Template:Smiley, you may be looking for Wikipedia:Vandalism, which makes us sad.
weasels are icky, they're animals and scary because i don't know what they'll do
– Weigurde (edit summary on User:Example2)
A message from Wikipedia mascot Puzzly
edit
Wikipedia is the richest source of information about red birds standing in trees, cotton tennis outfits and white balls lying on the ground.
Wikipedia is built by people like you who volunteer their free time writing useless encyclopedic articles about obscure paintings in Paris that nobody knows or cares about.
At the end of each year, many selfless people like you donate a small amount of money, so that Wikipedia can continue for another year.
Then, Wikipedia asks for money again, because they've spent all their time doodling and watching movies, instead of improving the software and keeping this top ten website online for hundreds of millions of visitors each month.
Free trivial knowledge without ads is invaluable: could you live without Wikipedia and its extensive coverage of TV series, and lists of inventors killed by their own invention?
Help protect this free, reliable, serious encyclopedia; give a few bucks today.
Puzzly
– concerning notice on List of highly toxic gases
My wife will appreciate that I've been pinged to this particular discussion.
– Ivanvector (Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 25 § Tits (boobs))
It was absolutely not my intention to appear as passive aggressive.
– Indigenous girl (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 June 5 § User:Immanuelle/Two-spirit)
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,000
AAAAAAAAAUUOOUH!
– commons: TimedText:Wilhelm Scream.ogg.en.srt (by 2001:8003:6057:9000:81CD:1170:86F0:12DC)
Triodia scintillans, the sparkling spinifex, or salt and vinegar chips spinifex is a species of grass in the genus Triodia. It tastes like salt and vinegar potato chips.
[...]
The plant was not tasted intentionally, and eating it is not recommended.
[...]
Nothing is known to eat the grass, and cows refuse to graze on it.
– Triodia scintillans (by Awkwafaba)
- JUMP SCARE
- (Is that unfair?)
- (Probably is, but I don't care.)
– Adam Cuerden (Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-09-16/Featured content)
Volapük is a constructed language created between 1879 and 1880 by Johann Martin Schleyer, a Catholic priest in Baden, Germany, who believed that God had told him in a dream to create an international language.
– from Volapük
Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
current | 09:29, 21 August 2023 | 1,920 × 1,080 (524 KB) | QuickQuokka (talk | contribs) | AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaa |
Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
21:44, 23 April 2023 | 1,000 × 500 (37 KB) | SpanishEmpireBall2009 (talk | contribs) | STOP REVERTING THIS IS THE REAL FLAG THE OTHER FLAG IS WRONG THIS FLAG IS THE REAL ONE FUCK EVERYONE THAT THINKS THE OTHER FLAG IS REAL ONE |
Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
current | 04:18, 8 November 2023 | 1,000 × 1,259 (275 KB) | PancoPinco (talk | contribs) | full and bigger |
This world map was created with Inkscape, or with something else.
– from File:Democracy claims.svg
i do not understand this wikidata shit
testing/trying to understand wikidata parameters (why did you immediately revert my edit, Bot, is it because i cursed? is that why?)
i really don't understand this wikidata stuff though
it couldn't possibly be this simple, could it?
please
– edit summaries from 99.146.242.37 on Wikipedia:Sandbox
In July 2011, web searches in China on the name Jiang were blocked following claims on the Sina Weibo microblogging site that former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) general secretary Jiang Zemin had died. Since the word "Jiang" meaning "river" is written with the same Chinese character (江), searches related to rivers including the Yangtze (Cháng Jiāng) produced the message: "According to the relevant laws, regulations and policies, the results of this search cannot be displayed."
Template:Tqb I am very sorry to hear about what happened to you. It sounds awful and I understand why you are so upset. Please do not give up on Wikipedia just because of that one experience. I urge you to contact Jimmy Wales directly to discuss your block. He is your only hope.
– from a wikipediocracy thread
trigger warning: emojis
The picture with the bloody content of the request to delete!
– from commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banner wikipe-tan 1.png
The Special Barnstar | |
HI
I LIKE YOU SEND ME A PECTURS OF YOUR DICK PLEASE Oldermen (talk) 23:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC) |
May I please have rollback rights? D o o t e d . (talk) 18:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Template:WithdrawnD o o t e d . (talk) 18:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
– a request on Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
quick on the draw, huh?
The humour is both dark and British
– from Sardines (Inside No. 9)
The helper's face has been disabled successfully
Compare these two sentences in which nothing plays the central role: While traveling to the city nothing happened and so I arrived safely; while getting ready to pay I discovered that there was nothing in my wallet, and so I had to go wash the dishes.
The popular tale is a love story between Zhinü (織女, the weaver girl, symbolizing Vega) and Niulang (牛郎, the cowherd, symbolizing Altair). Niulang was often abused by his sister-in-law. They eventually kicked him out of the house, and gave him nothing but an old cow. One day, the old cow suddenly spoke out, telling Niulang that there would be fairies bathing in the spring nearby that night. The fairy would stay there if she failed to go back to heaven before morning. In accordance with what the old cow said, Niulang saw those beautiful fairies in the spring, and fell in love with one of the beautiful fairies who was the heavenly weaver. In order to make her stay, he took her clothes that helped her to go back to heaven; this made her an ordinary earth woman without any power. They then got married and had two children. The Emperor of Heaven (玉皇大帝, Template:Literally) found out about this and was furious, so he sent minions to escort the heavenly weaver back to heaven. Niulang was heartbroken. The old cow suddenly spoke out again, telling Niulang he could take his skin to make it into a flying coat to chase after them; and Niulang did. However, the Queen Mother of the West drew a Silver River (The Milky Way) in the sky and blocked his way. Meanwhile, the love between Niulang and the weaver moved the magpie, and so they built a bridge of magpies over the Silver River for them to meet. The Emperor of Heaven was also moved by the sight, and allowed this couple to meet on the Magpie Bridge once a year on the seventh day of the seventh lunar month. That was the origin of the Qixi Festival.
– from Qixi Festival § Origin
this is one of the tamer chinese legends.
attempting to move and turn at the same time can sometimes lead the game to crash.
– from Lula 3D § Gameplay
I'm glad only the horse is dead, it looked for a while like the teacher's corpse would be called for as well.
– Beyond My Ken (from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive903 § Please review this block of a teacher)
Richard Eisenbeis of Kotaku observed the game as being "known as one of the most messed-up games ever released"
First international
Template:Ih-rt 47–0 Template:Ih
(Stockholm, Sweden; 12 February 1949)
Biggest defeat
Template:Ih-rt 47–0 Template:Ih
(Stockholm, Sweden; 12 February 1949)
– the infobox in Denmark men's national ice hockey team
3ㅤGrandmaster, candidate, and author
[...]
7ㅤ1962: success, setback, accusations of collusion
[...]
10ㅤ1969–1972: Road to World Champion
[...]
- 13.1ㅤLife as an émigré
- 13.2ㅤComments on September 11 attacks
- 13.3ㅤDetention in Japan
- 13.4ㅤCitizenship and residency in Iceland
- 13.5ㅤDeath, estate dispute, and exhumation
– selected section titles from Bobby Fischer
[editor's note: on 24 november 1971, d. b. cooper hijacked a plane and demanded a ransom equivalent to 1.4 million dollars in today's money. he jumped out of the plane with four parachutes, never to be found again. it remains the only unsolved case of air piracy. how did the investigation go? here's a few excerpts from the article...]
A month after the hijacking, the FBI distributed lists of the ransom serial numbers to financial institutions, casinos, racetracks, and other businesses that routinely conducted large cash transactions, and to law-enforcement agencies around the world. Northwest Orient offered a reward of 15% of the recovered money, to a maximum of $25,000. In early 1972, U.S. Attorney General John N. Mitchell released the serial numbers to the general public. Two men used counterfeit $20 bills printed with Cooper serial numbers to swindle $30,000 from a Newsweek reporter named Karl Fleming in exchange for an interview with a man they falsely claimed was the hijacker.
[...]
Although the CRT obtained little new information about the buried ransom money or Cooper's landing zone, they found, analyzed, and identified hundreds of organic and metallic particles on Cooper's tie.
[...]
During their attempts to build Cooper's DNA profile in 2002, the FBI discovered the hair sample had been lost.
[...]
In 1998, the FBI sought to extract DNA from the cigarette butts, but discovered the butts had been destroyed while in the custody of the Las Vegas field office.
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Stanistani! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 47th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Please accept the belated invitation below we forgot to provide you last year. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |
– from User talk:Stanistani § Sixteenth anniversary on Wikipedia!
[editor's note: read that carefully.]
I will go through your sources one by one:
1) A WP:PRIMARY source, so not independent
2) A WP:PRIMARY source, so not independent
3) A WP:PRIMARY source, so not independent
4) A WP:PRIMARY source, so not independent
– Qcne (from Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 September 27 § 17:41, 27 September 2023 review of submission by Jellybull)
The public are encouraged to send mail there, preferably on postcards. Its address is c/o Hyoryu Yubinkyoku 1317-2 Takumacho Awashima, Mitoyo Kagawa 769-1108 Japan.
– from Missing Post Office
should i sign off "sincerely" or "yours truly"?
– from File:This discussion is.png
This is not an edit
WHY IN HELL DID YOU UNACCEPT MY ARTICLE YOU SCUMBAGS.I CREATED SUCH A GOOD ARTICLE AND YET YOU BASHI BAZOUKS UNACCEPTED IT.OTHER ARTICLE CREATOR MADE SHORTER ARTICLES AND WITHOUT REFERENCES AND YET YOU ACCEPTED THEIRS.YOU JUST DON"T WANT TO BELIEVE A BANGLADESHI LIKE ME COULD WRITE ABOUT AN ARTICLE YOUR RACIST.HOPE THE ENTIRE WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION GOES STRAIGHT TO HELL
– a request on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk
– from Edit conflict
The budget is 25Million not 20 you absolute dumb fucking morons go to https://fastlaneng.louisianaeconomicdevelopment.com/public/search/ent and search five nights at freddy's in the searchbox u dumb retarded pumpkin seeds
In 2008, a book titled Hollywood Babylon: It's Back! was published. Written by Darwin Porter and Danforth Prince, the book had no participation or association with Kenneth Anger. Anger was reportedly so upset he placed a curse on the authors. (He was a self-proclaimed magician of the school of Thelema.)
– from Hollywood Babylon § Sequels
please unblock me and review my request being just and honest. If I'll not Successed to get justice here I'll ask the God for his justice.
– from Masking (personality)
[editor's note: jeez!]
William Topaz McGonagall (March 1825 – 29 September 1902) was a Scottish poet of Irish descent. He gained notoriety as an extremely bad poet
– from William McGonagall
At least include a decent definition of the article's bloody topic!
- 6.1ㅤFamily and relationships
- 6.2ㅤPhilanthropy
- 6.3ㅤTax fraud
– section headers from Lionel Messi
Alvin Duskin, is a San Francisco manufacturer of women's clothing, employing Betsey Johnson and Cathy Hardwick, launched a failed 1971 ballot measure (Proposition "T") to limit the height of buildings in San Francisco to 72 feet, and, with Jerry Mander and Warren Hinckle, exposed Lamar Hunt's proposal for sale and development of Alcatraz Island, and helped develop the Altamont Pass Wind Farms.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]
Reverted 1 edit by Peter Skuce; See talk page. Autism not a factor.. (TW)
(This character, 𰻝, is the simplified form of 𰻞.)
– from wikt:𰻝
Please do not edit this page.
– from User:Firebug
[editor's note: bit weak there, eh?]
The eighteen hells vary from narrative to narrative but some commonly mentioned tortures include: being steamed; being fried in oil cauldrons; being sawed into half; being run over by vehicles; being pounded in a mortar and pestle; being ground in a mill; being crushed by boulders; being made to shed blood by climbing trees or mountains of knives; having sharp objects driven into their bodies; having hooks pierced into their bodies and being hung upside down; drowning in a pool of filthy blood; being left naked in the freezing cold; being set aflame or cast into infernos; being tied naked to a bronze cylinder with a fire lit at its base; being forced to consume boiling liquids; tongue ripping; eye gouging; teeth extraction; heart digging; disembowelment; skinning; being trampled, gored, mauled, eaten, stung, bitten, pecked, etc., by animals.
– from Lüliang Mountains
In a 2019 interview, Ashley Madison's Chief Strategy Officer Paul Keable stated that the service helps create up to one million affairs every month.
[...]
On July 15, 2015, hackers stole all of its customer data—including emails, names, home addresses, sexual fantasies, and credit card information
– from Ashley Madison
Template:More citations needed
– from Proofreading
shouldn't somebody mention that this is an obvious NSA ploy? like google is? 96.28.215.48 (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)signed off of wikipedia forever
==Plot==
alright motherfucker you're on your own
– from the wikimedia discord
Geographically, ANI and ArbCom are in the low-lying desert, where nothing grows, no rain falls, and there's only the skeletons of animals that died.
A good chunk of editors that have left the project on poor terms probably spent too much time down there and thought that this was all of Wikipedia.
How sad! If only they had hitched their wagon and headed towards the greener pastures where the grass grows, the rain is plentiful, the weather is picture-perfect, the songbirds sing, and there is a farm with some cattle gracefully grazing. It's the land of milk and honey where articles flow out of. – from the wikimedia discord
Pierre Brassau was a Swedish artist and chimpanzee who was the subject of a 1964 hoax perpetrated by Åke "Dacke" Axelsson, a journalist at the Swedish tabloid Göteborgs-Tidningen. Axelsson came up with the idea of exhibiting a series of paintings made by a non-human primate, under the pretense that they were the work of a previously unknown French artist named "Pierre Brassau", in order to test whether critics could tell the difference between true avant-garde modern art and the work of a chimpanzee.
[...]
Rolf Anderberg of the Göteborgs-Posten wrote, "Brassau paints with powerful strokes, but also with clear determination. His brush strokes twist with furious fastidiousness. Pierre is an artist who performs with the delicacy of a ballet dancer." After the hoax was revealed, Anderberg insisted that Peter's work was "still the best painting in the exhibition".
– from Pierre Brassau
just added a table. now I want to yeet myself into the sun
– from the wikimedia discord
@User:Drmies—Template:Tq I take it you've never tried typing "electric toothbrush" into the Commons search box? ‑ iridescent 15:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive904 § Not just here, at Commons too
[editor's note: adult content warning, if that wasn't obvious enough already.]
A hip-hop dancer demons...
– File:Popping dancer.gif's caption cut off at an unfortunate spot in Dance § Gallery
In 2023, Australian MP Julian Hill advised the national parliament that the growth of AI could cause "mass destruction". During his speech, which was partly written by ChatGPT
– from ChatGPT § Existential risk
Im doing a research on the most sexually active animals on the face of the earth. It has come to my attention that a certain wild rat in Australia is the MOST sexually active as during the mating season, the male rat goes on a mating rampage where it does not stop to eat or drink but goes on mating for weeks until it dies of hunger and dehydration. may i know the nam of this particular rat? thank you very much.
- Mel Gibson ? StuRat 22:56, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
there are people who spend their lives just adding wikilinks instead of content.
– from an email sent to me
Template:Infobox medical condition (new)
– from Nightmare
On October 22, 2020, Katzenberg told the employees to listen to the song "Get Back Up Again" from the movie Trolls as he announced that the employees would be fired.
– from Jeffrey Katzenberg § Quibi
Thank you but IMO this is completely insane.
it is impossible to have a useful discussion with them
i want youtube
You are all just like the Chinese government. You get rid of my opinions. My voice. And I'm not a troll. Stop doing this to me you Chinese government fan
2ㅤCondemnation by Food and Drug Administration
3ㅤSee also
– section titles from Dr. Young's Ideal Rectal Dilators
- some excerpts from Pantone 448 C...
Pantone 448 C is a colour in the Pantone colour system. Described as a drab dark brown and informally dubbed the "ugliest colour in the world", it was selected in 2012 as the colour for plain tobacco and cigarette packaging in Australia, after market researchers determined that it was the least attractive colour.
The Australian Department of Health initially referred to the colour as "olive green", but the name was changed after concerns were expressed by the Australian Olive Association.
- olive green?!
N.B. As of 29 March 2018, the image there erroneously shows colour #5D4914, rather than #4A412A
N.B. As of 2018-03-29, the image there erroneously shows colour #4D442E, rather than #4A412A
N.B. As of 2018-03-29, the image there erroneously shows colour #594A13, rather than #4A412A
- it wouldn't be wikipedia without nitpicking.
See also
edit– from Lisp
- Discord kitten → List of Generation Z slang (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Was removed from the List of Gen Z slang article, leaving it mentionless as a redirect to a page with no useful information about the subject. "Kittens" are not mentioned at Discord either, making it not worth pointed there, so I feel it should be deleted until there's a reason to recreate it with content at a particular page. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- PLEASE delete this. Seeing this in my pages created feed is horrifying. B3251 (talk) 20:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7 § Discord kitten
RISE FROM YOUR GRAVE
– an edit summary in Raichu
This may result in my untimely death, but I don't think this infobox is helpful. Please revert instead of murder if you disagree.
See User talk:Jeremiah Gottwald. "I have a gazillion fake accounts." -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
– from User talk:Drmies/Archive 146 § Openly admitted sock master
– from Potoooooooo
The son views himself in a mirror, showing where his interests in the matter lie.
– from Marriage A-la-Mode (Hogarth)
<gallery>
File:Kitten.jpg|A cute kitten
File:Torture porn.jpg|Uhm... you get the idea. {{nsfw}}
</gallery>
– from commons: Template:Nsfw
Familiar yourself with other people using vocabulary words that you, do not understand, please. Please be wise on your messages because the more i read them the more I think you're being an egotistical presumptuous human being.
How stupid is Wikipedia?
editYou must have people that rode the short bus in school working at Wikipedia. If you think flat earth has been "disproven" and is an "archaic" concept then you have not looked into it from real souvenirs or you are dumb as a round rock. Not ONCE has earth been proven to be: a sphere; spinning 1,000 mph; circling the sun. NOT ONCE IDIOTS! 2601:603:381:5A0:19FA:CAE9:19D3:C00 (talk) 21:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
– a comment on Talk:Flat Earth
The show was created partially in response to the results of a National Geographic survey that indicated Americans had alarmingly little knowledge of geography, with one in four being unable to locate the Soviet Union or the Pacific Ocean.
I've nothing to say!
– from User:N30 uniqu3
HAARP is a target of conspiracy theorists, who claim that it is capable of weather manipulation. Commentators and scientists say that advocates of this and other conspiracy theories are wrong
At age 50, Dexter authored the book A Pickle for the Knowing Ones,[lower-alpha 1] in which he complained about politicians, the clergy, and his wife. The book contains 8,847 words and 33,864 letters, but without any punctuation and with unorthodox spelling and capitalization. One section begins: Template:Blockquote
The first edition was self-published in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1802. Dexter initially distributed his book for free, but it became popular and was reprinted eight times. The second edition was printed in Newburyport in 1805. In the second edition, Dexter responded to complaints about the book's lack of punctuation by adding an extra page of 11 lines of punctuation marks with the instruction that printers and readers could insert them wherever needed—or, in his words, "thay may peper and solt it as they plese".
– from Timothy Dexter § Writing
Undid revision 232521936 by David Fuchs (talk) This page was fine and did not need to be redirected to the game page. The g
– an edit summary on San Andreas (Grand Theft Auto)
Good luck with your war against the Canadians!
– from User talk:Only in death § Kemi Olunloyo
I regret to advise you that someone has hijacked your Wikipedia account and is using it to post preposterous idiocy in your name.
– from User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 203 § Let's delete Wikipedia just to be nice
I'll to make less gramticals erros in the future.
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143 § User:O recomeço and WP:CIR
I don't want to donate to you. No thanks. I am extremely poor as it is, i can literally hold my all of my cash balance in my hands right now. It's fifteen dollars. Literally. Fifteen dollars. And I can't spend my fifteen dollars because everybody hates me. They wont sell things to me. So i live in this dilapidated, destroyed house that nobody cares about me being in. Half my insulation is missing and my window doesn't close very easily. Even if i had more than 15 dollars, i can't give it to you because it's physical cash. I cannot email you cash. I can MAIL you cash but that's more than fifteen bucks. I am seriously thinking of whether i will die tonight of sheer cold simply by freezing to death in my sleep, and you think i can give you money.
My fingers are pink already and it's only 8:45 pm as I'm typing this. I wish I had the nerve to beg everybody for money but i don't. I can't. I need to conserve energy. I should seriously stop typing this but i don't care anymore. You can pry my money from my cold dead hands, literally, my cold dead hands. It is absolutely fucking freezing out here. And you want me to spare you 3 dollars. Insane. Go sleep in your nice, warm server room. Hope you're happy.
Stay humble. 2601:204:C500:1280:8D0F:A955:E466:2147 (talk) 04:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1207 § Stop asking me to donate
After dedicating three intensive 6 hours to thorough research, I meticulously crafted an informative article shedding light on the captivating essence of the Collège des Hautes Études de Stratégie et de Défense
– an edit summary in Collège des Hautes Études de Stratégie et de Défense
Speedy delete, salt, and forbid discussion of this ever again
– from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 16 § Template:Rescue
On November 19, 2023, I died.
– from an old revision of User:Queen of Hearts
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of chemical compounds with unusual names, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 16:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Run AstralTetration (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- mediawiki external wv(gF52fGsvTamjyu7HDtsgabY) {
- mediawiki info DMacks {
- user DMacks:GetInfo(InternetProtocol)
- new block attempt {
- blockreason = ez'd by tetration
- blocktime = indefinite
- blocklimitations = {
- editReversionImmunity = {
- [AstralTetration]
- }
- mediawiki console block log {
- return DMacks.blocklog()
- }
- }
- return sets to {
- wvlink(discord.gg/dgT2gS)
- }
- }
- }
- -{{ AstralTetration (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
– from an old revision of User talk:AstralTetration
I am not an ape...
editPlease correct this or I will sue Wikipedia for hosting libelious material in accordance with the article 125 of the Turkish Criminal Code.
– from an old revision of Talk:Human
Lead vocals on "The Most Unwanted Song" are provided by Emerson, whose high-pitched, operatic rapping is largely Western-themed (though one verse describes reading Ludwig Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, followed by an interlude where she sings a brief excerpt from it over pipe organ). A children's choir sings verses about holidays such as Christmas, Easter, Yom Kippur, Ramadan and Labor Day, each ending with a call to "do all your shopping at Walmart!" Near the end of the song, Mankin shouts various non-sequitur political phrases through a bullhorn–culminating in blaming the audience for slavery, imperialism, and genocide–followed by a "folk song" refrain sung in unison by her, Emerson, the choir, and "with luck, [the] audience".
– from The Most Unwanted Song § Lyrics and music
Hello, my name is Daniel and if you delete my files i will reuploud them. Thank you. I will not show my files to you.
– from commons: User:Danielfargo1
FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
– what you see when you visit wikipedia review
Ever since The Incident — you probably read about it in the papers — they have greatly restricted my computer access, therefore I have not been and will not be as active as I would like. For a while. After a certain period of good behavior the Local Council may restore my computer privileges. Thank you for your patience.
UPDATE: Rather than improving, my situation has deteriorated. Now I am no longer allowed access to the internet, amd am forbidden to watch television or listen to the radio. Nor am I allowed to view any periodicals published before 1960. The only way I can make edits is to mark up a printout and pass it to my majordomo to be typed into Wikipedia. Frustrating!
– from an old revision of User:Herostratus
3. Most critical to the project's success: certain untrustworthy administrators MUST BE REMOVED and banned from WP PERMANENTLY. This would include but not be limited to:
FT2 Durova David Gerard JzG MONGO Jayjg Elonka Jaakobou Raul654
– from User talk:EricBarbour
According to British conspiracy theorist David Icke, Alpha Draconis is the origin of blood-drinking, shape-shifting reptilians who lurk in underground bases on Earth and plot against humanity (with the aid of powerful figures including royalty).
– from Thuban § Conspiracy theory
The 2004 prize was awarded to Elfriede Jelinek. Academy member Knut Ahnlund, who had been inactive since 1996, resigned, alleging that selecting Jelinek had caused "irreparable damage" to the prize's reputation.
– from Nobel Prize controversies § 2004
Spindler ends the review by writing: "If you've ever considered playing this game, might I instead suggest: go outside?"
– from an old revision of The Coffin of Andy and Leyley
I'm a kawaii vtuber catgirl. I'm also a transhumanist.
– from User:Immanuelle
Undid revision 1188901141 by Ca (talk) , , and consensus #60
– an edit summary in Donald Trump
this is BULLSHIT.
ALL wikis are "incel wikis". By automatic definition. Because incels have the time and the irrational fixations to control a public wiki, and to fight off anyone who disagrees with them.
– EricBarbour on Wikipediocracy
Was it ever a thing?
– Ryuichi on Wikipediocracy
what a divine comedy the internet is!
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143 § GPTZero
Way too much emphasis in this article on the flaming onion volcano.
– from Talk:Teppanyaki § 'flaming onion volcano'
I stand guilty of being too polite. I will try harder not to let politeness get in the way of arguing a larger point. I apologize and I promise never to do it again. Please accept my contrition as sincerely bleating out of the heart.
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive296 § Tangential discussion
Here's an example of a parent grounding a character. "Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. [random character] how dare you [bad thing]. That's it. You are grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded for [a crazy amount of time]. Go to your room now."
– from Draft:Wrapper Offline § Origination
- Wikipedia:CAPINYOASS → Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
I'm all for derogatory shortcuts to some of our more toxic processes and noticeboards, but this one advocates violence. Please don't shoot the vandals. Blocking's sufficient. —Cryptic 06:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 22 § Wikipedia:CAPINYOASS
Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum Template:Not a forum
– from an old revision of Talk:ChatGPT
– from User talk:Theseeker2016 § June 2017
This entire discourse makes me wish we could nuke it from orbit, just to be sure. And by "it," I mean "the entirety of human civilization." Cheers, and happy Monday. Dumuzid (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
pseudomathematics (i.e. the work of mathematical cranks)
– from Squaring the circle
I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light. I'm safe in the light.
– from User:Mobius Gerig/I'm safe in the light
Pilk is a drink which is made by combining Pepsi and milk.
– from Pilk
Reverted 1 edit by Abu Haja (talk) In the Twinkle of an eye.
– an edit summary in User talk:TreasuryTag
In my last IT job, back around '05 (So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time) we had a help desk.
Call the help desk, and tell them your problem, the Help Desk looks into it, and either fixes it or not. Either way, they notify the caller, let them know what happened, and close the ticket. On rare occasions, the ticket gets escalated and given to someone else but it is still closed.
Open tickets are reported on the next day in the morning meeting in front of your supervisor.
So things ran smoothly and people's problems were addressed in a professional, timely fashion.
Until Chuck came along.
Chuck was a fussy, florid white guy with a huge chip on his shoulder from somewhere. He was an end-user of our applications and networks and hated everything. So he'd seethe, and start calling the help desk.
One day of Chuck's tickets would look something like this:
- The network is slow, it takes a minute or more to load up (name of application) it's delaying my work.
- The font on the application is too large, and I have to scroll down.
- The background color makes it difficult to accurately read the text.
- The application interface makes no sense, it doesn't fit my workflow.
- When I enter corrections into the form, and go to lunch, the application times out, and I have to do my work over.
- The Help Desk is not fixing my issues.
- The network is too slow.
- The application has too many features and is confusing me.
- The application is interfering with my workflow.
- I have trouble tickets from yesterday and I need my problems addressed.
- I asked the Help Desk to raise the priority on my tickets to the highest priority and they refused.
- The application needs to be revised to fit my preferences.
- The Help Desk deleted all my tickets from yesterday as 'problem not reproducible'!
We tried to calm him down, we visited his office to see if something was wrong with how his workstation was set up. After a while, we asked his supervisor to have a talk with Chuck. The supervisor refused, as Chuck was a loner with lots of guns.
Chuck began screaming and cursing at help desk employees. We talked to HR. Chuck received a verbal warning. After a few days, the trouble calls increased again.
He called the Help Desk more than 1700 times over five years. He was usually the topic of every morning meeting.
Then he had a heart attack and died.
We cleared all the tickets left, updated the reports, and deleted his user name. Then we had a pizza party.
– Zoloft on Wikipediocracy
Again, you have jumped in with an uninformative "answer". Please do not answer Teahouse questions unless you are highly confident that your answer is correct and helpful. Cullen328 (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- sure. Babysharkboss2 was here!! (Talking Heads) (DANTE) 20:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
– from User talk:Babysharkboss2 § WP:Teahouse#Quick Facts
3ㅤReaction
- 3.1ㅤSales
- 3.2ㅤHistorical inaccuracies
- 3.3ㅤLiterary criticism
- 3.3.1ㅤPositive
- 3.3.2ㅤDisparaging
- 3.3.3ㅤNegative
- 3.4ㅤLawsuits
– section titles from The Da Vinci Code
The theories range from allegations of a planned espionage mission, to a US government cover-up, to the consumption of the passengers' remains by giant crabs.
– from List of conspiracy theories § Korean Air Lines Flight 007
This is my fourth time writing something for this RfA. I wrote an oppose, a neutral, and a support. I've been struggling with this for about an hour now. Even as I am writing this, I have swung between neutral and support. This is tearing me apart at the moment and I really hope someone says something damning in favor or opposition of the candidate before the RfA ends so I can make my mind up.
– from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Night Watch § Neutral
Go away. No, seriously. I am a misanthrope. I grow more certain in my convictions about the human race with each passing day.
– from User:Nz17
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Toketaatalk 15:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm already well aware of that, the illuminatti directly contacted me a while back and threatened me, so it's no big deal to continue to serve the LORD even if you are offended by your iniquities. You'll just have to get in line, as I'm sure the vatican, the new world order, and quite a few others hated me first, but that's expected since I prefer to do things God's way, rather than my way. Too bad for them they are stuck here with me until I am translated too. 71.67.114.93 (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
– from an old revision of User talk:Immortalbeliever
Your advice was completely correct just, i dont want to bother
– from the wikimedia discord
I think we should create 10,000 more terrible stubs, saved or not, and then 10,000 more, and let’s just keep doing that indefinitely since no one is ever going to look at them again anyway, so who cares? Not my problem!
– FelinaLavandula on Wikipediocracy
This is not a matter of opinion. You're just wrong.
– from Talk:Parity of zero § Could we include some different opinion regarding zero parity?
Criticism
editBower has been described as a less competent chronicler than Fordun, with one commenter calling him "garrulous, irrelevant and inaccurate" and noting that he "makes every important occurrence an excuse for a long-winded moral discourse".
– from Scotichronicon § Criticism
Vanguard TV-3 (also called Vanguard Test Vehicle-Three), was the first attempt of the United States to launch a satellite into orbit around the Earth, after the successful Soviet launches of Sputnik 1 and Sputnik 2.
[...]
At its launch attempt on 6 December 1957, at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the booster ignited and began to rise, but about two seconds after liftoff, after rising about 1.2 m (four feet), the rocket lost thrust and fell back to the launch pad. As it settled, the fuel tanks ruptured and exploded, destroying the rocket and severely damaging the launch pad. The Vanguard 1A satellite was thrown clear and landed on the ground a short distance away with its transmitters still sending out a beacon signal. The satellite was damaged, however, and could not be reused.
[...]
A few days after the incident, a Soviet delegate to the United Nations inquired whether the United States was interested in receiving aid earmarked for "undeveloped countries".
– from Vanguard TV-3
Year | Award | Category | Subject | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | Stinkers Bad Movie Awards | Worst On-Screen Couple | Tom Green and any person, animal or foreign object | Won |
– from Freddy Got Fingered
correct it or u will face consequences
– from Talk:Quds News Network § Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 December 2023
– from File:Grindr User Survey Subculture.jpg
I am Good Devotee of god and wanted justice and so, JAY SWAMINRAYAN
– from User talk:Dhaumyasharma § December 2023
Letters from fans
editBASEBALLS BUGS IS AN UGLY IGNORANT FOOL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.166.166 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
– from User talk:Baseball Bugs/Snapshot081009 § Letters from fans
- ↑ The exact shade of paint may actually be a dark gray.Template:Cn "Black" refers solely to the color as defined in colloquial usage and is not intended to convey an authoritative understanding of the refractal properties of the machine.
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_(Guilty_Gear)#Concept_and_design
- ↑ Don't follow my example here. I'm clearly violating WP:ATAOGF.
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W5ezv_xxOk
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69VV0pH57XE
- ↑ https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/esports/guilty-gear-strive-brings-back-bridget-for-season-2-passes-1-million-units-shipped/ar-AA10rcRB
- ↑ https://www.shacknews.com/cortex/article/2054/guilty-gear-strive-season-pass-dlc-6-bridget-character-breakdown
- ↑ https://www.thegamer.com/guilty-gear-strive-bridget-officially-trans/
- ↑ https://kotaku.com/guilty-gear-strive-evo-2022-bridget-dlc-trans-rights-1849386887
- ↑ https://gamerant.com/guilty-gear-strive-facts-about-bridget/
- ↑ https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/857089363104104469/1006123339506516058/unknown.png
On 12 January 2010, Baidu.com's DNS records in the United States were altered such that browsers to baidu.com were redirected to a website purporting to be the Iranian Cyber Army, thought to be behind the attack on Twitter during the 2009 Iranian election protests, making the proper site unusable for four hours. Internet users were met with a page saying "This site has been attacked by Iranian Cyber Army". Chinese hackers later responded by attacking Iranian websites and leaving messages.
– from Baidu § Domain name redirection attack
It is my last name Jr321182 (talk) 06:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
– from wiktionary: Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/2024/January § Rinehart
Other than that, do you have a question you would like to ask related to the drafting process? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
All that we have learned is.
A. You are petty.
B. You are small.
C. You are arrogant.
D. You are a bully.
E. You aren't self aware.
F. You refuse to acknowledge your own clear bias and decided to you a system again a inexperienced minority. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atmospherpolyphonic (talk • contribs)
- Well, this was a blast. Best of luck in your future endeavours! soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
– from User talk:Atmospherpolyphonic § January 2024 4
Healthy young editor has idea, writes massive amount of code for helpful template, makes it available for others to use, ten years later - FOUR TRANSCLUSIONS. Many such cases!
– from the wikimedia discord
Q5: Is it possible for the text of this article to perfectly and accurately represent all of humanity?
- A5: No.
– from Talk:Human/FAQ
Residents of Butt Hole Road were determined to have the name of the street changed to deter tourists from visiting the street and to put an end to the jokes made about the street's name.
– from Butt Hole Road § Name change
I believe that the definition was added to insult somebody with that last name. It is my last name and I don't want this dictionary to decide that my last name means a "homosexual man". There is not a single other dictionary that is so crude as to claim that my name means a homosexual man. I have never met a person with the name Huckle that was a homosexual. It is entirely ridiculous to have all the people named Huckle change their last name. How would you like it if people voted to make your family name mean something that was off color. Just because one crude person decides to use somebodies name in a rude way doesn't make it a new definition for a word. Otherwise I'd be able to make the name of everybody who I don't appreciate something crude on this site. But I'd probably be sued for that action.
- Yeah, how would all the people feel if Dick suddenly meant something crude.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
– from wiktionary: Talk:huckle
Reviewers criticised the game's gameplay, graphics, controls, and music.
– from Pyongyang Racer
– from Super Straight
– from Fe, Fi, Fo, Fum, and Phooey
The candy bar protest, also known as the 5 cent chocolate war, the 5 cent war and the chocolate candy bar strike, was a short-lived 1947 protest by Canadian children over the increase in price of chocolate bars from five to eight cents. The strike began in Ladysmith, British Columbia, and spread across the country to include protests in Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Montreal, Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto and the Maritimes. The strike ended when the Toronto Evening Telegram published an editorial suggesting that one of the organizations allied with the children, the National Federation of Labour Youth, was backed by communists.
– from Chocolate bar strike
the fact he has no middle name is about as necessary as whether he was circumcised or not
– an edit summary on Jack Reacher
let's go ahead and assume that our readers haven't had a lobotomy, and know what the moon and an ass is.
– an edit summary on Mooning
San Francisco people is braindead about politics.
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1150 § Juniorpetjua
– from File:Kuchisake-onna conversation diagram.svg
– from Alice and Bob
Though it is a heavy decision to make, and one that will carry great weight in the future functioning of this encyclopedia, I believe I have the soundness of judgement required to make the optimal choice. To wit: I have intently analysed every word of the impassioned arguments presented in this section, both for and against, and have discovered that this discussion is pointless,
– from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Archive 64 § Bold, revert, discuss
Ban proposal
edit- Anyone who further contributes to the above thread will be banned.
- Support. As proposer. Fences&Windows 23:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Archive 64 § Bold, revert, discuss
My best creations
edit– from User:I'm tla § My best creations
– from Mewing (facial restructuring technique)
Mewing may refer to:
- Mew (cat vocalization), a soft crying sound
- Mewing (facial restructuring technique)
– from Mewing
In Saudi Arabia, dabbing was made illegal by the National Committee for Drug Control as it was deemed that it alludes to cannabis and other illegal substances. In August 2017, Saudi singer and actor Abdallah Al Shaharani was arrested for performing the move at a music festival in Ta'if, and afterward apologized in a tweet.
– from Dab (dance) § Illegality in Saudi Arabia
Jonathan Earl Woods, known as Jon Woods (born August 23, 1977, in Charlotte, North Carolina), is a Republican and a former member of both houses of the Arkansas General Assembly, a record producer, as well as a musician. He is now in federal prison for political corruption, wire and mail fraud, and money laundering.
– from Jon Woods
Balls
edit– from User:Greg L § Balls
So you’re the one who keeps reducing people like journalists like Jeremy Corbel and George Knapp ! UAP’s are real and so are other peoples bios! Where is your formal education on these subjects ????
edit– from an old version of Susan Gerbic
Government of Azerbaijan will take legal actions against Wikipedia if you keep doing this. Don't cry later! Aydinyol (talk) 08:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
– from Talk:Stepanakert/Archive 3 § Legal action against Wikipedia
– from Russian warship, go fuck yourself
Possible upcoming edits encouraged by Peter Thiel
editPeter Thiel is backing up the "Enheanced Games", a sports "event" that openly encourages doping. While browsing his page, i saw this link and it suggests to edit certain Wikipedia articles to replace certain words related to doping with words and phrasing that are more in his view.
There are 26 articles involved,
https://enhanced.org/update-wikipedia/
Twixtxter (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I had to laugh at the instruction to replace "cheating" with "demonstrations of science" and "cheated" becomes "Fought for science and bodily sovereignty"...kind of over the top. Schazjmd (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- [...]
- I'm off to fight for science and bodily sovereignty in poker. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive359 § Possible upcoming edits encouraged by Peter Thiel
– from Ted Cruz–Zodiac Killer meme
Plot
editThere is a "smoking hot babe" at the top, and Jump King wants to reach her. To reach her, he must jump up a series of platforms.
– from Jump King
Counterpoint to your counterpoint
editIf i shoved beans up my nose my nose would hurt
– from Wikipedia talk:Don't stuff beans up your nose/Counterpoint § Counterpoint to your counterpoint
Bla, bla, blobby, bloggy! Thanks for your meaningless post, please don't ping me again.
– from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georges Demulder
The game includes dark humour in the names and descriptions of some of its upgrades, achievements or mechanics, and generally has themes of dystopia, cosmic horror, and apocalypse. Examples include an achievement titled "Global Warming" (upon owning 100 factories), a news ticker tape reading "New cookie-based religion sweeps the nation." and the "Grandmapocalypse", in which "the screen turns molten red and the central cookie is attacked by 'wrinklers'", and the world at large is implied to have been taken over by a hive mind of mutated grandmothers.
– from Cookie Clicker § Themes
– from User talk:Das Kittles § February 2023
– from Climate change denial
cancel the useless information
– an edit summary in Hanfu
– from Rain of animals
– from When a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they are going to have the last word
"Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan" (1968), by J. G. Ballard, is a short story
– from Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan
The ancient Buddhist text Da zhidu lun contains a similar philosophical puzzle: a story of a traveller who encountered two demons in the night. As one demon ripped off all parts of the traveler's body one by one, the other demon replaced them with those of a corpse, and the traveller was confused about who he was.
– from Ship of Theseus § Alternative forms
- 05:11, 30 March 2006 Ahoerstemeier (talk | contribs) deleted page The weather in london (content was: 'Please don't delete this. I want to show it to my mommy. She is a nice lady. Here is a picture of the Weather in London.File:Weatherlond.jpg' (and the only contributor was 'Sak84'))
– from log 2197490
some selections from the logs for the weather in london:
content was 'wet'
content was: 'OH YES IT DOES HAHAHA!'
content was: '[http://members.lycos.co.uk/pwnzzz/ The Weather in London]'
content was: '{{delete}}grey, or gray, depending upon where you are from.'
content was: 'crap'
Deliberately NOT deleting talk page; content was: '{{deletebecause|its sunny in london at the moment (during the day)}}The weather in London is horrible, always raining.'
content was: '{{nonsense}}monster was here "=)"'
content was: 'Weather? What weather? 01:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)'
content was: '{{db|not encyclopaedic}}Scientists have been investigating the effects of a 7m-high wave travelling up the Thames, using computer simulations...'
content was: ''''The Weather in London''' is rainy, and is predicted to remain so until a couple of years beyond doomsday, ragnarok, etc.'
content was: 'The weather in motherfucking London.'
content was: '{{db-a1}}Dreary; foggy and wet.'
content was: '{{deletedpage}} I suspect it's raining.'
content was: '{{db-nonsense}}IT'S BAD... yo.'
content was: '{{db|Will someone please think of the red links}}London has rubbish Weather.'
These are some of the words and phrases that speakers through the years have ruled "unparliamentary" in the Parliament of Canada, the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba, the National Assembly of Québec, and the Legislative Assembly of Ontario: Template:Col div
- Parliamentary pugilist (1875)
- a bag of wind (1878)
- inspired by forty-rod whisky (1881)
- coming into the world by accident (1886)
- blatherskite (1890)
- the political sewer pipe from Carleton County (1917)
- lacking in intelligence (1934)
- a dim-witted saboteur (1956)
- liar (1959, 2022)
- devoid of honour (1960)
- joker in the house (1960)
- ignoramus (1961)
- scurrilous (1961)
- to hell with Parliament attitude (1961)
- trained seal (1961)
- evil genius (1962)
- demagogue (1963)
- Canadian Mussolini (1964)
- sick animal (1966)
- pompous ass (1967)
- crook (1971)
- does not have a spine (1971)
- fuddle duddle (1971)
- pig (1977)
- jerk (1980)
- sleazebag (1984)
- racist (1986, 1997 and 2020)
- absolute fraud (1986)
- lying scum (1987)
- scuzzball (1988)
- traitor (1992)
- son of a bitch (1997)
- modern‑day Klansmen (2002)
- weathervane (2007)
- Il Duce (2007)
- you piece of shit (2011)
- he doesn't give a fuck (2018)
- crap (2021)
– from Unparliamentary language § Canada
The last five-year plan, for the period from 1991 to 1995, was not completed, since the Soviet Union was dissolved in 1991.
– from Five-year plans of the Soviet Union
My friend, I am reliable sourcing.
– from User talk:GriffithsTorturer § January 2024
Its population declined from 1,000 in 1980 to five residents in 2020 because a coal mine fire has been burning beneath the borough since 1962.
– from Centralia, Pennsylvania
many customers complained, and the police were called to the venue.
– from Willy's Chocolate Experience
– from Badlands Guardian
These are the femme fatale lightning bugs of North America.
– from Photuris
Jonathan Earl Woods, known as Jon Woods (born August 23, 1977, in Charlotte, North Carolina), is a Republican and a former member of both houses of the Arkansas General Assembly, a record producer, as well as a musician. He is now in federal prison for political corruption, wire and mail fraud, and money laundering.
– from Jon Woods
Stop perverting and adultering reality to align with your evil view of the world, scumbags.
– an edit summary on Political views of Albert Einstein
– from Jan Smit (paleontologist)
i have issues and no theripist
– an edit summary on Wikipedia talk:Sandbox
wrote this from my Switch.
– an edit summary on User:Kimera Kat/Three word story
You must correct this or wikipedia will be taken to court for misinformation of change of history by Bengal President from India from Bengal region and Bangladesh for damaging the Bengalis rich heritage history of famous bengali figures.
Deleted a photo entitled 'hedgehog eating fallen fruits' as this is misinformation (hedgehogs do not possess a cecum, necessary to digest plant matter) and this common misconception has led to folk offering fruit to starving hogs, instread of nutritious food.
– an edit summary on European hedgehog
Ferdinand Rudow (2 April 1840 – 3 September 1920) was a German entomologist best known for the poor quality of his taxonomic work.
– from Ferdinand Rudow
I criticized you, and now I'm being compared to a murderous military autocracy.
Keep it, delete it, change the target, whatever. I'm out.
– from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 27 § FILE pointer
THE REST OF THIS PARA IS SO BAFFLING THAT I ASK SOMEONE WHO KNOWS WHAT IT MEANS TO REWRITE IT, PLEASE!!!
– a hidden comment on Christell
Oh please let's not start making articles.about parking lots now
- Too late for that…
- Ok. If anyone needs me I will be quietly screaming into a pillow
– from wikipediocracy
1ㅤMesoamerican Long Count calendar
- 1.1ㅤApocalypse
– section titles from 2012 phenomenon
2ㅤProstitution and tax evasion
– section titles from Heidi Fleiss
- 5.1ㅤZebulon Vance
- 5.4ㅤBombing attempt
6ㅤRemoval
- 6.1ㅤLegal issues
- 6.3ㅤLawsuits
- 6.4ㅤDemolition
– section titles from Vance Monument
On their walk, the bishop cut his finger on a rose thorn. Over lunch, Lillie enquired about his injury, asking: "How is your prick?" To which, the Bishop replied: "Throbbing", causing the butler to drop the potatoes.
– from Said the actress to the bishop § History and variations
– from Wikipedia:Super Mario effect § Reverse Super Mario Effect
STEP 1 EGG
STEP 2 PEAS
STEP 3 MORE EGG
STEP 4 MIX TOGHTER
STEP 5 DONE!
HOWTOMAKEIT.EXE BY 30SALTEJ
– from wikisource: Special:AbuseLog/167232
Sonnets 153 and 154 are filled with rather bawdy double entendres of sex followed by contraction of a venereal disease.
– from Sonnet 153
The page "Main page ban" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review, or you may create the page "Main page ban" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered. Taksen (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1155 § Mainspace Ban for Taksen
John Dillermand ("John Penisman", "John Willieman" or "John Dongman") is a Danish stop motion animated children's television series about a man and his very long penis.
– from John Dillermand
This is a very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very fun video game, and it is like real life, only better.
– from Special:AbuseLog/37084339 (Animal Crossing)
May 2024
edit- I’m unblocking myself. A Proud Alabamian (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- It didn’t work. A Proud Alabamian (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
– from User talk:A Proud Alabamian § May 2024 3
If you're still here on Wikipedia, leave. No one will notice.
– from User:Obsidian Soul
It's more of a mess than a dispute
– from an edit summary on Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars
Previously used as de facto public land, in 2014 the island was purchased by Cards Against Humanity LLC as part of a fundraiser for the Sunlight Foundation. After licensing the island for use by those who contributed to the campaign, the town of Liberty threatened the games company with hundreds of millions in fines for code violations.
– from Hawaii 2
Malbolge (/mælˈboʊldʒ/) is a public domain esoteric programming language invented by Ben Olmstead in 1998, named after the eighth circle of hell
– from Malbolge
Why don't you go there and try to be, oh, so funny? You're about as funny as vomit. 92.17.1.49 (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
– from User talk:EEng
- Social media – (View log)
Appears to be a marketing buzzword of limited currency. Current sources are not reliable and appear to be marketing fluff. Violates WP:NEO, WP:WINAD, WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS. Pdelongchamp 02:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social media
In 2014, Australian computer scientist Peter Vamplew submitted a paper to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology (IJACT) after being angered that the journal would not take his email off its mailing list. The article, in fact written a decade earlier by David Mazières and Eddie Kohler, was titled "Get me off your fucking mailing list" and consisted of the phrase "Get me off your fucking mailing list" being repeated for the entirety of the article body. The journal requested the researcher to "add some more recent references and do a bit of reformatting" saying that the article's "suitability for the journal was excellent". He was never taken off the mailing list.
– from List of scholarly publishing stings
[editor's note: here it is in all its glory.]
No consensus. That's the bottom line at this point.
– from Talk:List of battles of the Mexican–American War § Requested move
The investigation determined the cause of the crash was a suicide bombing, committed as insurance fraud.
– from Continental Airlines Flight 11
2ㅤArmy career
3ㅤTextiles
4ㅤWine and golf
5ㅤLater life
– section titles from an old revision of Ely Callaway Jr.
– section titles from Kik Messenger
The source makes no mention of whether the donkey lived or died.
– edit summary from Short 360
Comment What fresh hell is this?
– from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimsville, Georgia
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 00:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Neologism notable only for its association with a single project Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 19:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptocurrency
Saverland v. Newton (1837) is a court case in which a British man named Thomas Saverland brought an action against Miss Caroline Newton, who had bitten off the left half of his nose after he attempted to kiss her without consent. The judge ruled against him, stating that "When a man kisses a woman against her will, she is fully entitled to bite his nose off, if she so pleases."
– from Saverland v Newton
Predictions
editIt is worth nothing that the website predict the collapse of the financial system. EVERY WEEK. From 2009.
– from Talk:Zero Hedge/Archive 1 § Predictions
Infobox caption/Punky Brewster
edit@AldezD:, Not having information about where the image of Judith comes from is both ridiculous and patently stupid. Since i do not believe you are stupid, please re-familiarise yourself with WP:OWN. Paul Austin (talk) 11:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
– from Talk:Judith Barsi § Infobox caption/Punky Brewster
Please don't let your slavishness to the perfidious albion stop you from what is right.
– from User talk:Jimbo Wales
i try to balence editing, and helping, but always end up making shit worse.
– from User:Babysharkboss2
The community doesn't think it's generally reliable on trans issues.—S Marshall T/C 08:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey S Marshall, please reclose it. SerialNumber54129 18:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- S Marshall's point is a good one, to clarify: we have a situation in which those who took part in an RfC appear to have decided (with some room for dispute, of course) that X is a reliable publication on Y issue, but the broader community, when presented with the same issue, appears not to. Does the broader community (here) take precedence over the attendees of an RfC? Not necessarily; but who's got the appetite for another RfC?! SerialNumber54129 19:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe your third crack at this will be funny. Believe in yourself! Parabolist (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- S Marshall's point is a good one, to clarify: we have a situation in which those who took part in an RfC appear to have decided (with some room for dispute, of course) that X is a reliable publication on Y issue, but the broader community, when presented with the same issue, appears not to. Does the broader community (here) take precedence over the attendees of an RfC? Not necessarily; but who's got the appetite for another RfC?! SerialNumber54129 19:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
– from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
Question from Nuriel Sule (17:39, 11 October 2024)
editHello Are you born again? --Nuriel Sule (talk) 17:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Nuriel Sule Uh... I don't know, am I? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- To be born again you have accept Jesus as your Lord and Personal Savior. Nuriel Sule (talk) 08:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Nuriel Sule: Please do not evangelise here. Template:Tps— ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 09:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- I need to
- God sent me to you Nuriel Sule (talk) 18:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I'm atheist, so no thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Nuriel Sule: Please do not evangelise here. Template:Tps— ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 09:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- To be born again you have accept Jesus as your Lord and Personal Savior. Nuriel Sule (talk) 08:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
– from User talk:CanonNi
Cite error: <ref>
tags exist for a group named "lower-alpha", but no corresponding <references group="lower-alpha"/>
tag was found